Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 43331/09, 27877/10, 36144/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,37802
EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 43331/09, 27877/10, 36144/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,37802)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.10.2015 - 43331/09, 27877/10, 36144/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,37802)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Oktober 2015 - 43331/09, 27877/10, 36144/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,37802)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,37802) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 2312/08

    MAKTOUF ET DAMJANOVIC c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 43331/09
    This will include instances where there is recent, negative case-law of the domestic appeal court in cases which are factually or legally similar to the applicant's case and where there is no likelihood of the appeal court reversing its own recent precedent (see, for instance, Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, §§ 59 and 60, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 34932/04, § 76, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Gas and Dubois v. France (dec.), no. 25951/07, 31 August 2010; Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, §§ 121-123, 11 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 25951/07

    Keine Diskriminierung, wenn einer Frau ein Adoptionsrecht in Bezug auf das Kind

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 43331/09
    This will include instances where there is recent, negative case-law of the domestic appeal court in cases which are factually or legally similar to the applicant's case and where there is no likelihood of the appeal court reversing its own recent precedent (see, for instance, Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, §§ 59 and 60, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 34932/04, § 76, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Gas and Dubois v. France (dec.), no. 25951/07, 31 August 2010; Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, §§ 121-123, 11 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 06.01.2011 - 34932/04

    Rolandas Paksas

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 43331/09
    This will include instances where there is recent, negative case-law of the domestic appeal court in cases which are factually or legally similar to the applicant's case and where there is no likelihood of the appeal court reversing its own recent precedent (see, for instance, Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, §§ 59 and 60, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 34932/04, § 76, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Gas and Dubois v. France (dec.), no. 25951/07, 31 August 2010; Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, §§ 121-123, 11 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 1948/04

    Somalia, Abschiebungshindernis, zielstaatsbezogene Abschiebungshindernisse,

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 43331/09
    This will include instances where there is recent, negative case-law of the domestic appeal court in cases which are factually or legally similar to the applicant's case and where there is no likelihood of the appeal court reversing its own recent precedent (see, for instance, Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, §§ 59 and 60, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 34932/04, § 76, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Gas and Dubois v. France (dec.), no. 25951/07, 31 August 2010; Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, §§ 121-123, 11 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 24344/08

    THOMAS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    This will include instances where there is recent, negative case-law of the domestic appeal court in cases which are factually or legally similar to the applicant's case and where there is no likelihood of the appeal court reversing its own recent precedent (see Chakkas and Others v. Cyprus [dec], nos. 43331/09, 27877/10 and 36144/11 § 23, 20 October 2015).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht