Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 5928/13, 32514/13, 68065/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Oktober 2015 - 5928/13, 32514/13, 68065/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,28556)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,28556) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SERIFOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 38945/05
PRALICA v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 5928/13
As regards the first applicant, it is observed that a judgment in which the Court finds a violation of the Convention or of its Protocols imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found (see Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 71-73, ECHR 2006-XIV, Marcic and Others, cited above, §§ 64-65; and Pralica v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 38945/05, § 19, 27 January 2009). - EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96
BAUMANN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 5928/13
The issue of whether domestic remedies have been exhausted is normally determined by reference to the date when the application was lodged (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V and Vincic and Others v. Serbia, nos. 44698/06, 44700/06, 44722/06, 44725/06 and others, § 51, 1 December 2009).