Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SPROGE v. LATVIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 21724/03

  OOO 'VESTI' AND UKHOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 7407/06

  The answer to this question depends on the circumstances and the special features of each particular case and may include: the nature and extent of the judge's functions during both sets of proceedings; whether in other sets of proceedings the judge has made statements which create an impression of a predetermined opinion in the proceedings; and whether the outcome of the proceeding was based on the evidence produced and arguments heard at the hearing (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July, cited above, §§ 78-80; Delage and Magistrello v. France (dec.), no. 40028/98, ECHR 2002-III; and, as a recent example, OOO "Vesti" and Ukhov v. Russia, no. 21724/03, § 79, 30 May 2013).
• EGMR, 24.01.2002 - 40028/98

  DELAGE et MAGISTRELLO contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 7407/06

  The answer to this question depends on the circumstances and the special features of each particular case and may include: the nature and extent of the judge's functions during both sets of proceedings; whether in other sets of proceedings the judge has made statements which create an impression of a predetermined opinion in the proceedings; and whether the outcome of the proceeding was based on the evidence produced and arguments heard at the hearing (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July, cited above, §§ 78-80; Delage and Magistrello v. France (dec.), no. 40028/98, ECHR 2002-III; and, as a recent example, OOO "Vesti" and Ukhov v. Russia, no. 21724/03, § 79, 30 May 2013).
• EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

  LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 7407/06

  The second test determines whether there are ascertainable facts which may raise doubts as to the impartiality of a body sitting as a bench (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2007-IV; and, as a recent example, Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, §§ 73-78, 23 April 2015).

• EGMR, 08.06.2023 - 46530/09

  URGESI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Toutefois, il ne suffit pas, à cet égard, que les deux procédures en cause tirent leur origine du même contexte factuel, les questions qu'elles sont appelées à trancher pouvant être en substance différentes (voir Pasquini c. Saint-Marin, no 50956/16, §§ 145-150, 2 mai 2019, Sproge c. Lettonie (déc.), no 7407/06, §§ 34-35, 20 octobre 2015, Mugliett v. Malta (déc.), no 46661/12, §§ 29-30, 28 May 2013, et Steulet c. Suisse, no 31351/06, §§ 40-41, 26 avril 2011).