Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 39558/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,43018) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
URUÇ v. TURKEY
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 39558/10
As the award of compensation was an automatic consequence of the applicant's acquittal, it did not amount to a finding of a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see, in this connection, Medeni Kavak v. Turkey, no. 13723/02, § 34, 3 May 2007, and Elgay v. Turkey, no. 18992/03, § 32, 20 January 2009; for a similar approach in Italian cases, see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 143, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 13723/02
MEDENI KAVAK c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 39558/10
As the award of compensation was an automatic consequence of the applicant's acquittal, it did not amount to a finding of a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see, in this connection, Medeni Kavak v. Turkey, no. 13723/02, § 34, 3 May 2007, and Elgay v. Turkey, no. 18992/03, § 32, 20 January 2009; for a similar approach in Italian cases, see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 143, ECHR 2000-IV).