Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 28702/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,49467) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FLUX v. MOLDOVA
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00
ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 28702/03
It considers that, with the passage of time, not only does it become more difficult for the media to prove the facts on which they may have relied, but also the damage to the person allegedly defamed by the relevant material is bound to fade away (confer Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 53, ECHR 2004-IV). - EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91
TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 28702/03
The Court finally reiterates that the gravity of the penalty is also a part of the criteria for verifying whether an interference with Article 10 was proportionate (see Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, § 51; Karatas and Sari v. France, no. 38396/97, § 53, 16 May 2002). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89
JERSILD v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 28702/03
The article was, therefore, published within the framework of an ongoing public debate on the issue, which gives its content further protection under Article 10 of the Convention (see Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, § 33). - EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74
SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 28702/03
The Court notes that the article was written by a journalist and recalls the pre-eminent role of the press in a democratic society to impart ideas and opinions on political matters and on other matters of public interest (see Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, § 65).
- EGMR, 16.01.2020 - 59347/11
MAGOSSO ET BRINDANI c. ITALIE
La Cour rappelle également qu'avec l'écoulement du temps non seulement il devient plus difficile pour les médias de prouver les faits sur lesquels ils se sont fondés, mais aussi le préjudice pour la personne prétendument diffamée par les éléments pertinents est amené à disparaître (Flux c. Moldova (no 1), no 28702/03, § 31, 20 novembre 2007).