Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZAHARIEVA v. BULGARIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 6194/06
• EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 6194/06
• EGMR - 6194/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 31.03.1992 - 18020/91

  X c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 6194/06

  What was at stake for the applicant in the litigation must also be taken into account in certain cases (see, among many other authorities, X v. France, 31 March 1992, § 32, Series A no. 234-C).
• EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 21387/05

  BANKS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 6194/06

  In as much as the applicant alleged that the proceedings did not resolve the wider problems relating to the supply of anti-cancer medicines in Bulgaria, the Court, while by no means wishing to minimise the importance of that issue, does not consider that it falls to be examined by reference to the applicant's rights under Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Banks and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 21387/05, 6 February 2007).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 6194/06

  The Court's task in cases arising from individual applications is not to review domestic law in the abstract, but to examine the manner in which that law has been applied to the applicants (see, among other authorities, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 153, Series A no. 324; Pham Hoang v. France, 25 September 1992, § 33, Series A no. 243; Sommerfeld, cited above, § 86; and S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813/00, § 92, ECHR 2011-...).

 
• EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13191/87

  PHAM HOANG c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 6194/06

  The Court's task in cases arising from individual applications is not to review domestic law in the abstract, but to examine the manner in which that law has been applied to the applicants (see, among other authorities, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 153, Series A no. 324; Pham Hoang v. France, 25 September 1992, § 33, Series A no. 243; Sommerfeld, cited above, § 86; and S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813/00, § 92, ECHR 2011-...).
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 25732/05

  KRIVOVA v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 6194/06

  In those circumstances, the award of damages to the applicant may be regarded as an appropriate form of redress in respect of the alleged breaches of Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the Convention in her case (see, mutatis mutandis, Krivova v. Ukraine, no. 25732/05, § 50, 9 November 2010).
• EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 27617/04

  R.R. ./. Polen

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 6194/06

  In relation to the first question, the Court observes that it has in the past held that if the infringement of the right to life or to personal integrity is not caused intentionally, the obligations under the relevant Articles of the Convention may be satisfied if the domestic legal system affords the victim a remedy enabling any liability of the persons concerned to be established and any appropriate civil redress, such as an order for damages and for the publication of the decision, to be obtained (as regards Article 2, see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I, and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; and as regards Articles 3 and 8, see R.R. v. Poland, no. 27617/04, §§ 97 and 104-09, ECHR 2011-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 6194/06

  In relation to the first question, the Court observes that it has in the past held that if the infringement of the right to life or to personal integrity is not caused intentionally, the obligations under the relevant Articles of the Convention may be satisfied if the domestic legal system affords the victim a remedy enabling any liability of the persons concerned to be established and any appropriate civil redress, such as an order for damages and for the publication of the decision, to be obtained (as regards Article 2, see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I, and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; and as regards Articles 3 and 8, see R.R. v. Poland, no. 27617/04, §§ 97 and 104-09, ECHR 2011-... (extracts)).