Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 30, Art. 36, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 2 en ce qui concerne le manque à protéger le droit à la vie Violation de l'art. 2 en ce qui concerne l'absence d'enquête effective Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MAKARATZIS v. GREECE
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 30, Art. 36, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the failure to protect the right to life Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the lack of an effective investigation Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch) - juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
- haufe.de (Kurzinformation)
Der finale Rettungsschuss - Rechtsfragen nach dem Knall
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 50385/99
- EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
Papierfundstellen
- NJW 2005, 3405
Wird zitiert von ... (220) Neu Zitiert selbst (15)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93
ILHAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
This, however, does not exclude in principle an examination of the applicant's complaints under Article 2, the text of which, read as a whole, demonstrates that it covers not only intentional killing but also situations where it is permitted to use force which may result, as an unintended outcome, in the deprivation of life (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 75, ECHR 2000-VII).The Court's case-law states at the same time that, in exceptional circumstances, physical ill-treatment by State agents that does not result in death may disclose a violation of Article 2 (see paragraphs 43-44 and 51-52 of the judgment; see also Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, 1 March 2001, and Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 76, ECHR 2000-VII).
The Court has reiterated in Tekin v. Turkey, ([GC], no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000-VII) and Ä°lhan v. Turkey (judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV) that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity and that this assessment depends on all the circumstances of the case, namely the duration of the treatment, its physical or moral effects and the state of health of the victim.
- EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-47).In these circumstances, while we welcome the improvements in the law governing the carrying and use of firearms by police officers which were introduced in Greece in July 2003 (see paragraph 27 of the judgment), we have not found it to be either necessary or appropriate to examine in the abstract the compatibility with Article 2 of the legislative provisions in force at the relevant time (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 47, § 153) or to base our conclusion on any deficiency in those provisions.
- EGMR, 01.03.2001 - 22493/93
BERKTAY c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
The Institute acknowledged that the Court had already extended the applicability of Article 2 to cases where the applicant was not killed, but regretted the fact that it had limited the scope of its scrutiny to "only exceptional circumstances" (see Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, 1 March 2001).The Court's case-law states at the same time that, in exceptional circumstances, physical ill-treatment by State agents that does not result in death may disclose a violation of Article 2 (see paragraphs 43-44 and 51-52 of the judgment; see also Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, 1 March 2001, and Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 76, ECHR 2000-VII).
- EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93
GÜL v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
The remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 96, ECHR 2002-II; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 100, 14 December 2000; Ä°lhan, cited above; and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
The remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 96, ECHR 2002-II; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 100, 14 December 2000; Ä°lhan, cited above; and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
The remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 96, ECHR 2002-II; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 100, 14 December 2000; Ä°lhan, cited above; and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
The circumstances in which deprivation of life may be justified must therefore be strictly construed (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
The Court itself recognised that, in certain circumstances, a merely "potential" or "virtual" victim of a violation was entitled to take action under the Convention (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
It observes that there was a judicial determination of the facts of the instant case at domestic level (see paragraph 19 above) and that no material has been adduced in the course of the Strasbourg proceedings which could call into question the findings of fact of the Athens First-Instance Criminal Court and lead the Court to depart from them (see Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, pp. 17-18, § 30). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94
ÇAKICI v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 86, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93
MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22492/93
KILIÇ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98
VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95
REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02
BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court will begin by noting that although only one of the present applications, brought by Ms Budayeva, concerns the death of a family member, the circumstances of the case in respect of the other applicants leave no doubt as to the existence of a threat to their physical integrity (see, mutatis mutandis, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 52-55, ECHR 2004-XI). - EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
NATCHOVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
In cases concerning the use of force by State agents, it must take into consideration not only the actions of the agents of the State who actually administered the force but also all the surrounding circumstances, including such matters as the relevant legal or regulatory framework in place and the planning and control of the actions under examination (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 46, § 150, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 56-59, ECHR 2004-XI). - OLG Nürnberg, 19.10.2010 - 2 Ws 227/10
Keine Anklage gegen Polizeibeamte im Fall Tennessee Eisenberg
Es ist nicht erkennbar, dass die oben unter B II 1.1) dargestellten Ermittlungen nicht im angemessenen Umfang oder mit nicht geeigneten Mitteln geführt worden wären ( EGMR , NJW 2005, 3405).
- EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI
Consequently, in those Article 2 cases in which the Court specifically addressed the question of whether a belief was perceived, for good reasons, to be valid at the time, it did not adopt the standpoint of a detached observer; instead, it attempted to put itself into the position of the person who used lethal force, both in determining whether that person had the requisite belief and in assessing the necessity of the degree of force used (see, for example, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2004-XI; Oláh v. Hungary (dec.), 56558/00, 14 September 2004 and Giuliani and Gaggio, cited above, § 189 ). - EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 1049/17
NIKA v. ALBANIA
The primary duty on the State to secure the right to life entails, in particular, putting in place an appropriate legal and administrative framework defining the limited circumstances in which law enforcement officials may use force and firearms, in the light of the relevant international standards (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 57-59, ECHR 2004-XI, and Bakan, cited above, § 49; see also the relevant paragraphs of the UN Principles, paragraph 154 above).The Court reiterates that in previous similar cases it has examined the existing legal or regulatory framework in respect of the use of lethal force (see McCann and Others, cited above, § 150, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 56-59, ECHR 2004-XI).
- EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13
NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE
It also requires the State to make regulations compelling institutions, whether private or public, to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of people´s lives (see, in the context of the use of force by State agents, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 151, Series A no. 324; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 58, 59 and 62, ECHR 2004-XI; Peri?Ÿan and Others v. Turkey, no. 12336/03, § 85, 20 May 2010; in the context of health care, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu, cited above, § 130; Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043/14, § 140, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Lopes de Sousa Fernandez, cited above, § 166, and Fernandes de Oliveira, cited above, § 105; in the context of industrial activities, Öneryildiz, cited above, §§ 71 and 90, and Kolyadenko and Others, § 158). - EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 52806/09
VILNES AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
Article 2 was inapplicable since, as the Court held in Makaratzis v. Greece ([GC], no. 50385/99, § 50, ECHR 2004-XI), "it [was] only in exceptional circumstances that physical ill-treatment... which [did] not result in death [might] disclose a violation of Article 2 of the Convention." In the present case, the Government stressed, the applicants were alive; the fact that other divers operating in the North Sea in the same period as the applicants had died from a variety of causes should not influence the Court's assessment of whether the applicants" rights under Article 2 had been breached.In a number of judgments the term "real and immediate risk" is used when considering the scope of the State's obligations under Article 2 in different circumstances (see, among other authorities, Osman v. United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, § 116 in fine; Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 68, ECHR 2002-VIII; and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 71, ECHR 2004-XI).
- EGMR, 24.03.2011 - 23458/02
Tod eines Demonstranten beim G-8-Gipfel in Genua
The primary duty on the State to secure the right to life entails, in particular, putting in place an appropriate legal and administrative framework defining the limited circumstances in which law enforcement officials may use force and firearms, in the light of the relevant international standards (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 57-59, ECHR 2004-XI, and Bakan, cited above, § 49; see also the relevant paragraphs of the UN Principles, paragraph 154 above). - EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 26562/07
Geiseldrama von Beslan - Russland verurteilt
The Court reiterates, next, that in previous cases it has examined the legal or regulatory framework existing for the use of lethal force (see McCann and Others, cited above, § 150, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 56-59, ECHR 2004-XI). - EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10
Transnistrien
At the same time, it is only in exceptional circumstances that physical ill-treatment by State agents which does not result in death may disclose a violation of Article 2 of the Convention (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 51, ECHR 2004-XI). - EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 41237/14
Italien muss Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt entschädigen
- EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 60561/14
S.M. c. CROATIE
- EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 11327/14
HAÁSZ AND SZABÓ v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 52391/99
RAMSAHAI AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 54241/08
CAMEKAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 23458/02
GIULIANI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 77633/16
MARCELLO VIOLA c. ITALIE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 77144/01
Rechtssache C. und T. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43326/05
LEONIDIS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 50196/99
BUBBINS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 07.02.2006 - 41773/98
SCAVUZZO-HAGER ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 65899/01
TANIS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57947/00
ISSAIEVA, YOUSSOUPOVA ET BAZAÏEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 45076/05
ARSKAYA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 75632/01
EKREM c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 43134/05
G.N. u.a. ./. Italien
- EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 3566/16
ALKHATIB ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 23502/06
Bomben auf kurdische Dörfer: Türkei muss Schmerzensgeld zahlen
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 32704/04
DENIS VASILYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 16281/10
AYDAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57950/00
ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57942/00
KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 26074/18
V v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 32245/19
MACHALIKASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 22.07.2014 - 50275/08
ATAYKAYA c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 23944/04
EREMIASOVA AND PECHOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 37795/13
TEKIN ET ARSLAN c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 22.12.2015 - 68736/11
LYKOVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 64937/19
ELVAN c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 21.06.2018 - 36083/16
SEMACHE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.08.2009 - 23458/02
GIULIANI ET GAGGIO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 33050/18
GHAZARYAN AND BAYRAMYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 4864/05
OYAL v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 27849/03
BEYAZGÜL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 73974/14
TSALIKIDIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 50772/11
ERDINÇ KURT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 23445/03
ESMUKHAMBETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 13326/18
PÂRVU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 3648/04
CAVIT TINARLIOGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 8810/05
DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 12336/03
PERISAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.08.2020 - 48756/14
TËRSHANA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 82284/17
JEANTY c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 03.09.2019 - 41660/10
DOBROVITSKAYA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 40485/08
PETROVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45653/99
ANDREOU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2019 - 50283/13
FOUNTAS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 45104/05
KOTELNIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 44827/08
ABDULLAH YASA ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 10425/09
ACATRINEI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 43606/04
YOTOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 39541/98
DÖLEK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.02.2023 - 59435/17
ALHOWAIS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 7309/04
VEFA SERDAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42606/05
IZCI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 6978/08
GHEORGHE COBZARU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 14547/04
SAT c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 48913/99
YÜREKLI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 54169/00
ENZILE ÖZDEMIR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00
ANIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 43347/09
EBRU DINÇER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 18308/10
B.I. c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 48475/09
SAKIR c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 41465/09
MUHACIR ÇIÇEK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 22931/09
BEHÇET SÖGÜT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 42139/12
PISARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 56838/08
ALECU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 25.02.2014 - 651/10
MAKBULE KAYMAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 70077/11
TIMUS AND TARUS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 10036/03
BEKTAS AND ÖZALP v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 28975/04
WASILEWSKA AND KALUCKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 4762/05
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 51210/99
NEHYET GÜNAY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 22893/05
RODIC ET AUTRES c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 45900/99
YASAROGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.10.2005 - 27526/95
GÜNAYDIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.06.2023 - 2186/12
YENGIBARYAN AND SIMONYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 36418/20
Russland hat zu Nawalny nicht hinreichend ermittelt
- EGMR, 19.05.2022 - 31754/18
BOURAS c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 23524/14
MÎTU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 02.04.2020 - 8938/07
KUKHALASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 10015/10
BASAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 11244/12
GULYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 71428/12
MENDY c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 11275/07
MURADYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 40001/08
ABDULKHADZHIYEVA AND ABDULKHADZHIYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 37158/09
KALKAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 47532/09
HAKIM IPEK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.01.2015 - 15191/12
KITANOVSKI v.
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
ATIMAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 02.09.2014 - 28732/09
SANSAL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 29675/02
LEYLA ALP ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 30086/05
DIMOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 60444/08
KAYAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 11209/10
RUSTAMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 23038/07
ÜLÜFER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 36150/04
DAMAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 19202/03
ILIYA PETROV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 17811/04
AYDEMIR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 1503/02
KHAMZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 17170/04
KERIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 22746/03
ÖLMEZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 25404/09
GAFOROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 22465/03
SANDRU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 13670/03
ARZU AKHMADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.02.2008 - 43443/98
MANSUROGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.02.2008 - 57084/00
USTA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.10.2007 - 9375/02
SAOUD c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 50939/99
BAKAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03
ZELILOF v. GREECE
- EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 40073/98
IHSAN BILGIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 50739/99
PERK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.02.2006 - 45500/99
TZEKOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 38595/97
KAKOULLI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 36749/97
HAMIYET KAPLAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 84523/17
DARAIBOU v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 44592/16
BOBOC AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 04.11.2021 - 62161/14
KHOJOYAN AND VARDAZARYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 06.07.2021 - 71998/13
YEMKUZHEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 13013/11
CANTARAGIU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 78643/11
MARIUS ALEXANDRU ET MARINELA STEFAN c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 03.03.2020 - 33373/07
AVDYUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 24964/09
DZHIOYEVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 2256/09
NANIYEVA AND BAGAYEV v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 76805/11
KRAULAIDIS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 7469/06
CANGÖZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 35152/09
DALAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 20620/10
ERCAN BOZKURT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 15028/09
SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 18.06.2015 - 41675/08
FANZIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 34160/09
DOBRE ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09
CIORCAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 69842/10
ALBAKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.04.2014 - 68780/10
GUERDNER ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 64200/13
KORKMAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 64126/13
SARISÜLÜK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 2215/05
ARAPKHANOVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 53248/09
ERDAL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 24867/04
FILIPOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 3434/05
YERME c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 40310/06
DÜZOVA c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 29846/05
NAKAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 47357/08
ALIKAJ ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 25732/05
KRIVOVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 272/05
VLAEVI c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 37971/02
RUPA c. ROUMANIE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 4860/02
LEPARSKIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 30304/02
HALIS AKIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.11.2008 - 21586/02
AKHMADOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99
KASA v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 70659/01
JUOZAITIENE AND BIKULCIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 12458/03
SUAT ÜNLÜ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 36672/97
KURNAZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 21449/04
CELNIKU c. GRECE
- EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 54182/00
HALIT CELEBI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR - 57385/22 (anhängig)
KORKMAZ c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 57916/16
HUBERT NOWAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
TOTCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
- EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 77370/16
I.I. AND M.S. v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 17.12.2020 - 11464/12
YUKHYMOVYCH v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 15014/11
HASAN KÖSE v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 46820/09
KARATAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 15225/08
ALTIN ET KILIÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 15428/09
ADAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 25382/12
LAMARTINE ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 20.05.2014 - 39438/05
BINISAN v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 2228/10
GAMTSEMLIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 1529/10
P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 35887/11
DE SANTIS ET OLANDA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 20.06.2013 - 73455/11
SIDIKOVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 17253/07
DIMITAR SHOPOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04
PUTINTSEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2011 - 59461/08
MATUSHEVSKYY AND MATUSHEVSKA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 1062/03
GOLUBEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 77766/01
DZIECIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 57049/00
YÜKSEL ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 51480/99
ERIKAN BULUT v. TURKEY
- EGMR - 35857/06
YUDIN v. UKRAINE and 31 other applications
- EGMR - 45036/18 (anhängig)
M.Ö. v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR - 43194/22 (anhängig)
YASAR c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR - 53117/20 (anhängig)
KORTAK c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 26.02.2019 - 49169/16
AMRAHOV v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 28008/14
KRIVOLUTSKAYA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 5821/10
GERASIMENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 34673/07
DÖNDÜ GÜNEL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.05.2015 - 35279/10
MELNICHUK AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 26330/12
BLONSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 52534/09
TAYDAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 6800/10
FANAELOU v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 47354/07
UMAYEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 31682/07
KHAMZATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 4348/02
TROFIN c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 22.03.2011 - 22102/09
HEIKKINEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 47304/07
BERÜ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 19406/05
ZASHEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 63106/00
VASIL SASHOV PETROV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2010 - 9191/06
SULEYMANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.03.2007 - 57389/00
HUOHVANAINEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 32597/96
HALIT DINÇ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 45784/99
SULTAN KARABULUT c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 42442/98
DAGDAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.07.2022 - 10829/11
MAGOMAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 42329/11
BISAR AYHAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 1227/06
GAVRYLOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 18545/04
DIBIROVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43170/04
DZHAMAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 28226/02
GÜLEN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 5722/04
KARCHEN ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR - 11613/14 (anhängig)
SZABÓ v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 26.02.2019 - 74628/16
KHUDUNTS v. AZERBAIJAN