Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 18299/03, 27311/03 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FINOGENOV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE [Extraits]
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
Non-violation de l'art. 2 (volet matériel) Violation de l'art. 2 (volet matériel) Violation de l'art. 2 (volet procédural) Préjudice moral - réparation (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FINOGENOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
No violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FINOGENOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)
[DEU] No violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect);Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect);Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award
- gv.at
Finogenow u.a. ./. Russland
Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
- 123recht.net (Pressemeldung, 21.12.2011)
Vorgehen bei Geiselnahme in Moskau verurteilt // Russland muss Hinterbliebene von Todesopfern entschädigen
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Finogenov and Others v. Russia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 18299/03
- EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 18299/03, 27311/03
- EGMR, 27.08.2012 - 18299/03
Wird zitiert von ... (5)
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 22782/06
ABDULKHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court further reiterates that Article 2 contains a positive obligation of a procedural character: it requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force by the authorities (see Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, §§ 268 et seq., ECHR 2011 (extracts), with further references). - EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13
KRDZALIJA AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
There is nothing in the material in the Court's possession to suggest that in the present case the domestic authorities failed to secure the relevant physical or forensic evidence, or to seek out relevant witnesses or relevant information (see Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, § 271, ECHR 2011 (extracts), and Armani Da Silva, cited above, § 233). - EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16
AHMET TUNÇ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
The Court refers in this connection to the principles set out in its case-law in respect of the substantive and procedural obligations under that Article (see, for instance, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-49, Series A no. 324; Isayeva and Others, cited above, §§ 168-200 and §§ 208-25; Erdogan and Others v. Turkey, no. 19807/92, §§ 65-95, 25 April 2006; Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, §§ 206-82, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Gülbahar Özer and Others v. Turkey, no. 44125/06, §§ 58-76, 2 July 2013; Cangöz and Others v. Turkey, no. 7469/06, §§ 105-49, 26 April 2016; Döndü Günel v. Turkey, no. 34673/07, §§ 22-35, 6 September 2016; and Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14
GULIYEV AND SHEINA v. RUSSIA
18299/03, 27311/03, § 196, 18 March 2010). - EGMR, 04.02.2021 - 39997/17
KAPLATYY v. UKRAINE
In this context they noted that, according to the Court's case law, in particular, the case of Finogenov and Others v. Russia (nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, ECHR 2011 (extracts)), only close relatives of a deceased person or those who without being married constituted a de facto family may claim to be themselves victims of a violation of Article 2 of the Convention.