Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.H. KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 3 MRK
  No violation of Art. 8 (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  A.H. Khan v. the United Kingdom

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 07.11.2000 - 31519/96

  KWAKYE-NTI ET DUFIE contre les PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 6222/10

  However, the Court has previously held that there will be no family life between parents and adult children or between adult siblings unless they can demonstrate additional elements of dependence (Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 97, ECHR 2003 X; Kwakye-Nti and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000).
• EGMR, 18.10.2006 - 46410/99

  Rechtssache ÜNER gegen die NIEDERLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 6222/10

  Finally, the Government pointed out that the Tribunal which heard the applicant's appeal against deportation had considered all of the relevant factors as set out by the Grand Chamber in Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, §§ 57-58, ECHR 2006-XII, and had concluded that in all the circumstances of his case, his deportation would be proportionate.
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 53080/07

  MIAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 6222/10

  The Court recalls that, as Article 8 protects the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world and can sometimes embrace aspects of an individual's social identity, it must be accepted that the totality of social ties between settled migrants such as the applicant and the community in which they are living constitutes part of the concept of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8. Indeed it will be a rare case where a settled migrant will be unable to demonstrate that his or her deportation would interfere with his or her private life as guaranteed by Article 8 (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 17, 27 April 2010).

• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 31039/11

  NOVRUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Indeed, it would be a rare case in which a settled migrant would be unable to demonstrate that his or her removal would interfere with his or her "private life" (see Samsonnikov v. Estonia, no. 52178/10, §§ 81-82, 3 July 2012, and A.H. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 6222/10, § 32, 20 December 2011).
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 52178/10

  SAMSONNIKOV v. ESTONIA

  Indeed it will be a rare case where a settled migrant will be unable to demonstrate that his or her deportation would interfere with his or her private life as guaranteed by Article 8 (see A.H. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 6222/10, § 32, 20 December 2011, and Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 17, 27 April 2010).
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 24379/20

  BAJRAMI v. DENMARK

  However, apart from observing that such statements cannot be considered established facts, on the basis of the other material before it, the Court is not convinced that the first applicant's children's best interests were adversely affected by his deportation to such an extent that those should outweigh the other criteria to be taken into account (see, for example, A.H. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 6222/10, § 40, 20 December 2011; Salem v Denmark, cited above, § 78; and Assem Hassan Ali v. Denmark, cited above § 61).
• EGMR - 64534/19 (anhängig)

  MAHAMUD v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Is there, given the specific circumstances of the case, "family life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention between the applicant and his brother? In particular, has the applicant demonstrated that there are "additional elements of dependence" (see Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 97, ECHR 2003-X, and A.H. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 6222/10, § 32, 20 December 2011) between him and his brother?.