Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RUIZ-VILLAR RUIZ v. SPAIN

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  RUIZ-VILLAR RUIZ c. ESPAGNE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [FRA]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 33915/96

  WALDER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 16476/11

  The Court, while acknowledging the complexity of proceedings such as the present ones, has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising similar issues (see, in particular, Walder v. Austria, no. 33915/96, § 28, 30 January 2001, and Klug v. Austria, no. 33928/05, § 37, 15 January 2009, both relating to land consolidation proceedings which took twenty-two years and twenty years respectively).
• EGMR, 03.04.2003 - 54589/00

  ANAGNOSTOPOULOS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 16476/11

  Additionally, according to the Court's case-law, an applicant must have made normal use of domestic remedies which are likely to be effective and sufficient and, when a remedy has been pursued, use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see Günaydin v. Turkey (dec.), no. 27526/95, 25 April 2002; and Anagnostopoulos v. Greece, no. 54589/00, § 32, 3 April 2003).
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33928/05

  KLUG v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 16476/11

  The Court, while acknowledging the complexity of proceedings such as the present ones, has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising similar issues (see, in particular, Walder v. Austria, no. 33915/96, § 28, 30 January 2001, and Klug v. Austria, no. 33928/05, § 37, 15 January 2009, both relating to land consolidation proceedings which took twenty-two years and twenty years respectively).

 
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 16476/11

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 13.10.2005 - 27526/95

  GÜNAYDIN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 16476/11

  Additionally, according to the Court's case-law, an applicant must have made normal use of domestic remedies which are likely to be effective and sufficient and, when a remedy has been pursued, use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see Günaydin v. Turkey (dec.), no. 27526/95, 25 April 2002; and Anagnostopoulos v. Greece, no. 54589/00, § 32, 3 April 2003).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 16476/11

  The Court reiterates that the principle of subsidiarity set forth in Article 35 of the Convention is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity to prevent or put right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Convention institutions (see, for example, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999 V).
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 38285/09

  GARCÍA MATEOS v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 16476/11

  The Court further observes, as it found in the judgment in the case of García Mateos v. Spain (no. 38285/09, 19 February 2013), that it would be excessive to ask the applicant to pursue yet another set of proceedings in order to be able to be awarded compensation for the excessive length of proceedings (ibid., § 31).