Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 35021/97, 45774/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,50727) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOLB, HOLAUS, TAXACHER and WECHSELBERGER v. AUSTRIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 35021/97, 45774/99
- EGMR, 17.04.2003 - 35021/97
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 35021/97
Future income only constitutes a "possession" if it has been earned or where an enforceable claim exists (see Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 23 § 50; van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23), or where the applicant may argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining the effective enjoyment of a property right (see the Pine Valley Developments Ltd. and Others v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51). - EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 35021/97
Future income only constitutes a "possession" if it has been earned or where an enforceable claim exists (see Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 23 § 50; van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23), or where the applicant may argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining the effective enjoyment of a property right (see the Pine Valley Developments Ltd. and Others v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51). - EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14282/88
ZANDER v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 35021/97
The dispute must be genuine and serious; it may relate not only to the actual existence of a right but also to its scope and the manner of its exercise; and, finally, the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question which must be civil in nature (see for instance the Zander v. Sweden judgment of 25 November 1993, Series A no. 279-B, p. 38, § 22). - EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 11796/85
WIESINGER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 35021/97
The Government further pointed out that the present case had to be distinguished from the case of Wiesinger v. Austria (judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 213). - EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80
VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 35021/97
Future income only constitutes a "possession" if it has been earned or where an enforceable claim exists (see Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 23 § 50; van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23), or where the applicant may argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining the effective enjoyment of a property right (see the Pine Valley Developments Ltd. and Others v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51).