Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 54318/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,6851) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
J.M.O. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
J.M.O. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 19.05.2016 - 37289/12
J.N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 54318/14
The test applied by the United Kingdom courts is therefore almost identical to that applied by this Court under Article 5 § 1(f) of the Convention in determining whether or not detention has become "arbitrary" (see J.N. v. the United Kingdom, no. 37289/12, § 97, 19 May 2016). - EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 2478/15
NICKLINSON AND LAMB v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 54318/14
2478/15 and 1787/15, § 89, 23 June 2015). - EGMR, 01.09.2016 - 49734/12
V.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 54318/14
The power to detain a person pending deportation is contained in Paragraph 2 of Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 1971 ("the 1971 Act"), (for details see V.M. v. the United Kingdom, no. 49734/12, § 52, 1 September 2016). - EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00
AZINAS c. CHYPRE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 54318/14
It normally requires that the complaints intended to be made at international level should have been aired before the appropriate domestic courts, at least in substance, in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among many other authorities, Peacock v the United Kingdom, no. 52335/12 (dec.) 5 January 2016; Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III; and Nicklinson and Lamb v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 52335/12
PEACOCK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 54318/14
It normally requires that the complaints intended to be made at international level should have been aired before the appropriate domestic courts, at least in substance, in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among many other authorities, Peacock v the United Kingdom, no. 52335/12 (dec.) 5 January 2016; Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III; and Nicklinson and Lamb v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos.