Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.T. v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits and rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.01.2001 - 32636/96
• EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 32636/96

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 32636/96

  In this context, the Court reiterates that the public character of court hearings constitutes a fundamental principle enshrined in paragraph 1 of Article 6. Admittedly, neither the letter nor the spirit of this provision prevents a person from waiving of his own free will, either expressly or tacitly, the entitlement to have his case heard in public, but any such waiver must be made in an unequivocal manner and must not run counter to any important public interest (see, among other authorities, the Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, p. 19, § 58, and the Pauger v. Austria judgment of 28 May 1997, Reports 1997-III, p. 895, § 58).
• EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86

  ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 32636/96

  The Court further reiterates that the failure to request a hearing has been considered an unequivocal waiver where the courts" practice is not to hold one of their own motion but where the law explicitly provides for the possibility to request one (see the Zumtobel v. Austria judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, p. 14, § 34, and the Schuler-Zgraggen judgment, cited above, ibid.) or were there is at least a practice to hold one upon a party's request (see the Pauger judgment, cited above, § 60).
• EGMR, 30.11.1987 - 8950/80

  H. v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 32636/96

  On the other hand such failure is irrelevant, where the law explicitly excludes a hearing (see the Diennet v. France judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, p. 15, § 34) or where, though the law does not contain a specific rule, the court's practice is never to hold one (see the Werner judgment, cited above, p. 2510, § 48, and the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127, p. 36, § 54).

 
• EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91

  DIENNET v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 32636/96

  On the other hand such failure is irrelevant, where the law explicitly excludes a hearing (see the Diennet v. France judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, p. 15, § 34) or where, though the law does not contain a specific rule, the court's practice is never to hold one (see the Werner judgment, cited above, p. 2510, § 48, and the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127, p. 36, § 54).
• EGMR, 03.10.2000 - 29477/95

  EISENSTECKEN c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 32636/96

  As to the costs of the Strasbourg proceedings, the Court having regard to the Government's comments as well as to comparable cases (see as recent authorities, Eisenstecken v. Austria, no. 29477/95, § 41, ECHR 2000-X, and Entleitner v. Austria, no. 29544/95, 01.08.2000, § 28, both concerning the lack of a public hearing in land consolidation proceedings) and making an assessment on an equitable basis, awards the applicant a total amount of EUR 4, 600 for costs and expenses incurred in the Strasbourg proceedings.
• EGMR, 01.08.2000 - 29544/95

  ENTLEITNER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 32636/96

  As to the costs of the Strasbourg proceedings, the Court having regard to the Government's comments as well as to comparable cases (see as recent authorities, Eisenstecken v. Austria, no. 29477/95, § 41, ECHR 2000-X, and Entleitner v. Austria, no. 29544/95, 01.08.2000, § 28, both concerning the lack of a public hearing in land consolidation proceedings) and making an assessment on an equitable basis, awards the applicant a total amount of EUR 4, 600 for costs and expenses incurred in the Strasbourg proceedings.