Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.03.2023 - 34787/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,5047) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITICHYAN v. ARMENIA
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MITICHYAN v. ARMENIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93
NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2023 - 34787/12
Also, no heed was paid to the form of the impugned statements, made orally and reported by a journalist thereby - presumably - reducing or eliminating the applicant's possibility of reformulating, perfecting or retracting them before publication (see, mutatis mutandis, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 48, ECHR 1999-VIII). - EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96
CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2023 - 34787/12
While mindful that a careful distinction needs to be drawn between facts and value judgments (CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 98, ECHR 2004-XI), the Court also considers that such a distinction is of less significance in a case such as the present, where the impugned statements were made in the course of a lively political debate at local level. - EGMR - 28473/12 (anhängig)
KREJZOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2023 - 34787/12
The Court is mindful of the fundamentally subsidiary role of the Convention system (see Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12, § 175, 15 November 2016).