Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 59253/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,11520) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
POA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
POA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EKMR, 20.01.1987 - 11603/85
COUNCIL OF CIVIL SERVICE UNIONS et autres c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 59253/11
As regards the POA, the first applicant, this condition is met, since it was the complainant before the Committee on Freedom of Association (contrast with EÄŸitim ve Bilim Emekçileri Sendikası c. Turquie, no 20641/05, § 38, CEDH 2012 (extraits); Council of Civil Service Unions v. the United Kingdom, no. 11603/85, Commission decision of 29 January 1987, Decisions and Reports 50, pp. - EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97
WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 59253/11
It cannot set this admissibility criterion aside merely because the Government have not made a preliminary objection based upon it (see, mutatis mutandis, Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I, which concerned the application of the six-month time-limit under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention).
- EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 31045/10
THE NATIONAL UNION OF RAIL, MARITIME AND TRANSPORT WORKERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
That has not occurred in the present case (contrast with POA and Others v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59253/11, 21 May 2013, where the applicant trade union had already submitted an identical complaint to the Committee on Freedom of Association, which had issued its decision on the merits). - EGMR, 27.06.2023 - 22515/14
BRYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates that its competence is restricted in relation to any applications falling within the scope of Article 35 § 2 (b) and it has no jurisdiction over such cases (see POA and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59253/11, § 27, 21 May 2013).Furthermore, the applicants were not a party to those proceedings and the Government of the Netherlands were not acting before the UNCLOS tribunal as a representative of the applicants, who were not associated in the proceedings in any way (see, a contrario, POA and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59253/11, §§ 30-32, 21 May 2013).
- EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 75118/12
YÜCESOY c. TURQUIE
La Cour rappelle en outre que, d'après la jurisprudence des organes de la Convention, le Comité de la liberté syndicale de l'Organisation internationale du travail (OIT) doit être considéré comme une « autre instance internationale ", au sens de l'article 35 § 2 b) de la Convention (Cereceda Martín et autres c. Espagne (déc.), no 16358/90, décision de la Commission du 12 octobre 1992, Fédération hellénique des syndicats des employés du secteur bancaire c. Grèce (déc.), no 72808/10, 6 décembre 2011, et Poa et autres c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 59253/11, 21 mai 2013).