Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 31154/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,11028) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NIKOLOVA v. \
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NIKOLOVA v. \
[MAC] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NIKOLOVA v. \
[MAC] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NIKOLOVA v. \
[ALB] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
NIKOLOVA v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 3172/07
LUKAREV v.
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 31154/07
The Court reiterates that according to Rule 47 § 6 of the Rules of Court, applicants must keep the Court informed of all circumstances relevant to their application and that incomplete and therefore misleading information may also amount to abuse of the right of application, especially if the information concerns the very core of the case (see Cervenáková v. Czech Republic (dec.), no. 26852/09, §§ 25-27, 23 October 2012, Lukarev v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 3172/07, ECHR 15 January 2013). - EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 26852/09
CERVENÁKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 31154/07
The Court reiterates that according to Rule 47 § 6 of the Rules of Court, applicants must keep the Court informed of all circumstances relevant to their application and that incomplete and therefore misleading information may also amount to abuse of the right of application, especially if the information concerns the very core of the case (see Cervenáková v. Czech Republic (dec.), no. 26852/09, §§ 25-27, 23 October 2012, Lukarev v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 3172/07, ECHR 15 January 2013). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 31154/07
Having regard to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law for assessing the reasonable time requirement contained in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in particular the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities, as well as what was at stake for the applicant (see, among many other authorities, Philis v. Greece (no. 2), judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports 1997-IV, § 35; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; and Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV), the Court considers that the proceedings were unduly prolonged, for which the respondent State bears sole responsibility. - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 31154/07
Having regard to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law for assessing the reasonable time requirement contained in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in particular the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities, as well as what was at stake for the applicant (see, among many other authorities, Philis v. Greece (no. 2), judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports 1997-IV, § 35; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; and Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV), the Court considers that the proceedings were unduly prolonged, for which the respondent State bears sole responsibility.