Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 27790/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,59119) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KUDRINA v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 25964/02
POZNAKHIRINA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 27790/03
Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; and, more recently, Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, 24 February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, 18 November 2004), the Court finds that by failing to comply with the judgment of 25 December 2002 in the applicant's favour the domestic authorities violated her right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money which she was entitled to receive.The Court finds that in the present case this principle applies as well, having regard to the violations found (cf. Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, § 33, 24 February 2005, and Sukhobokov, cited above, § 34).
- EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 15021/02
WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 27790/03
Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; and, more recently, Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, 24 February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, 18 November 2004), the Court finds that by failing to comply with the judgment of 25 December 2002 in the applicant's favour the domestic authorities violated her right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money which she was entitled to receive.
- EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 24349/05
POGOSYAN v. RUSSIA
The Court has found a violation of an applicant's "right to a court" guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in many cases in which a judgment that had become final and binding was subsequently quashed by a higher court with the view of carrying out a fresh examination (see Dovguchits v. Russia, no. 2999/03, §§ 26-31, 7 June 2007; Kudrina v. Russia, no. 27790/03, §§ 15-20, 21 June 2007; Sidorenko v. Russia, no. 3519/05, §§ 12-19, 26 July 2007; and Kot, cited above, §§ 23-30).