Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 27790/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,59119
EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 27790/03 (https://dejure.org/2007,59119)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.06.2007 - 27790/03 (https://dejure.org/2007,59119)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Juni 2007 - 27790/03 (https://dejure.org/2007,59119)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,59119) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 25964/02

    POZNAKHIRINA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 27790/03
    Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; and, more recently, Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, 24 February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, 18 November 2004), the Court finds that by failing to comply with the judgment of 25 December 2002 in the applicant's favour the domestic authorities violated her right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money which she was entitled to receive.

    The Court finds that in the present case this principle applies as well, having regard to the violations found (cf. Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, § 33, 24 February 2005, and Sukhobokov, cited above, § 34).

  • EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 15021/02

    WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 27790/03
    Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; and, more recently, Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, 24 February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, 18 November 2004), the Court finds that by failing to comply with the judgment of 25 December 2002 in the applicant's favour the domestic authorities violated her right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money which she was entitled to receive.
  • EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 24349/05

    POGOSYAN v. RUSSIA

    The Court has found a violation of an applicant's "right to a court" guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in many cases in which a judgment that had become final and binding was subsequently quashed by a higher court with the view of carrying out a fresh examination (see Dovguchits v. Russia, no. 2999/03, §§ 26-31, 7 June 2007; Kudrina v. Russia, no. 27790/03, §§ 15-20, 21 June 2007; Sidorenko v. Russia, no. 3519/05, §§ 12-19, 26 July 2007; and Kot, cited above, §§ 23-30).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht