Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  E.S. c. SUÈDE

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Non-violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale (Article 8-1 - Respect de la vie privée) (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  E.S. v. SWEDEN

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SÖDERMAN v. SWEDEN - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08
• EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 5786/08
• EGMR, 09.07.2014 - 5786/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08

  Thus the complaint intended to be made subsequently to the Court must first have been made - at least in substance - to the appropriate domestic body, and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V, with further references).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08

  Based on this finding, and with reference, inter alia, to Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and the Court's case-law under these provisions, in particular the case of Kudla v. Poland ([GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI), the Supreme Court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation under Swedish law for both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages.
• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08

  In interpreting them, since the Convention is first and foremost a system for the protection of human rights, the Court must have regard to the changing conditions within Contracting States and respond, for example, to any evolving convergence as to the standards to be achieved (see, for example, Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 74, ECHR 2002-VI).

 
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08

  These obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for private life even in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves (see Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 32, Series A no. 32 and X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 23, Series A no. 91).
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08

  While recourse to the criminal law is not necessarily the only answer, effective deterrence against grave acts where fundamental values and essential aspects of private life are at stake requires efficient criminal law provisions (see, for example, X and Y v. the Netherlands cited above, §§ 24 and 27, M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII and K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, § 43, 2 December 2008).
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48009/08

  Keine Pflicht zur Vorabbenachrichtigung bei Veröffentlichung privater …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08

  The same is true where the activities at stake involve a most intimate aspect of private life (see, among others, Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007-I and Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 109, 10 May 2011).
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 104, 7 February 2012).
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 55164/08

  A. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08

  The states are to maintain and apply in practice an adequate legal framework affording protection against acts of violence by private individuals (see, for example, A v. Croatia, no. 55164/08, § 60, 14 October 2010).