Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MANUKYAN v. ARMENIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MANUKYAN v. ARMENIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 62903/15

  KURT v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  The Court will therefore examine whether the authorities knew or should have known of the existence of a real and immediate risk that S. Manukyan would commit suicide and, if so, whether they did all that could reasonably have been expected of them to avoid that risk from materialising (see Kurt v. Austria [GC], no. 62903/15, §§ 157-60, 15 June 2021).
• EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 27866/03

  BEKER v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  At the same time, and due to the authorities' own failure to conduct an adequate investigation into the matter, the material before the Court does not allow it to support the hypothesis that S. Manukyan's life was taken intentionally (contrast Beker v. Turkey, no. 27866/03, §§ 45-54, 24 March 2009, and Lapshin v. Azerbaijan, no. 13527/18, §§ 110-20, 20 May 2021; see also, mutatis mutandis, Mi?¾igárová v. Slovakia, no. 74832/01, § 89, 14 December 2010).
• EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 39583/05

  PEREVEDENTSEVY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  Substantive limb 17. The Court will examine the matter in the light of the relevant general principles, as summarised in Mosendz v. Ukraine (no. 52013/08, §§ 90-93, 17 January 2013), Perevedentsevy v. Russia (no. 39583/05, §§ 91-94, 24 April 2014), Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan (no. 30500/11, §§ 64-68, 1 June 2017) and most recently in Boychenko v. Russia (no. 8663/08, §§ 76-80, 12 October 2021, with further references).

 
• EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 32631/09

  Fall Magnitski: Russland verletzte mehrfach Menschenrechte

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  It is thus unnecessary to examine the other aspects of the investigation (see, mutatis mutandis, Magnitskiy and Others v. Russia, nos. 32631/09 and 53799/12, § 272, 27 August 2019, and Anahit Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 3673/11, § 101, 7 May 2020).
• EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 30677/10

  DURDU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  Thus, any allegation that the applicant's son was murdered would be purely speculative (see, mutatis mutandis, Abdullah Yilmaz, cited above, § 59, and Durdu v. Turkey, no. 30677/10, §§ 59-61, 3 September 2013).
• EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 52013/08

  MOSENDZ v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  Substantive limb 17. The Court will examine the matter in the light of the relevant general principles, as summarised in Mosendz v. Ukraine (no. 52013/08, §§ 90-93, 17 January 2013), Perevedentsevy v. Russia (no. 39583/05, §§ 91-94, 24 April 2014), Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan (no. 30500/11, §§ 64-68, 1 June 2017) and most recently in Boychenko v. Russia (no. 8663/08, §§ 76-80, 12 October 2021, with further references).
• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11

  MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  Substantive limb 17. The Court will examine the matter in the light of the relevant general principles, as summarised in Mosendz v. Ukraine (no. 52013/08, §§ 90-93, 17 January 2013), Perevedentsevy v. Russia (no. 39583/05, §§ 91-94, 24 April 2014), Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan (no. 30500/11, §§ 64-68, 1 June 2017) and most recently in Boychenko v. Russia (no. 8663/08, §§ 76-80, 12 October 2021, with further references).
• EGMR, 07.05.2020 - 3673/11

  ANAHIT MKRTCHYAN v. ARMENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  It is thus unnecessary to examine the other aspects of the investigation (see, mutatis mutandis, Magnitskiy and Others v. Russia, nos. 32631/09 and 53799/12, § 272, 27 August 2019, and Anahit Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 3673/11, § 101, 7 May 2020).
• EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 21899/02

  ABDULLAH YILMAZ c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  Furthermore, States are required to secure high professional standards among regular soldiers, whose acts and omissions - particularly vis-à-vis conscripts - could, in certain circumstances, engage their responsibility, inter alia, under the substantive limb of Article 2 (see Abdullah Yilmaz v. Turkey, no. 21899/02, §§ 56-57, 17 June 2008, see also, mutatis mutandis, Stoyanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 42980/04, § 61, 9 November 2010).
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 42980/04

  STOYANOVI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 2303/12

  Furthermore, States are required to secure high professional standards among regular soldiers, whose acts and omissions - particularly vis-à-vis conscripts - could, in certain circumstances, engage their responsibility, inter alia, under the substantive limb of Article 2 (see Abdullah Yilmaz v. Turkey, no. 21899/02, §§ 56-57, 17 June 2008, see also, mutatis mutandis, Stoyanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 42980/04, § 61, 9 November 2010).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 20.05.2021 - 13527/18

  LAPSHIN v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 8663/08

  BOYCHENKO v. RUSSIA