Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 21055/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68695) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GASPARI v. SLOVENIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 21055/03
- EGMR, 24.10.2018 - 21055/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94
Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 21055/03
With regard to the applicant's Convention costs, the Court reiterates that it does not consider itself bound by domestic scales and practices, although it may derive some assistance from them (see, among many other authorities, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, § 77, Series A no. 316-B, and Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 98, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 21.11.2002 - 36747/02
ARSLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 21055/03
The applicant therefore complied with the six-month rule provided in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention and this objection by the Government must be dismissed (see Arslan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 36747/02, ECHR 2002-X (extracts)). - EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91
TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 21055/03
With regard to the applicant's Convention costs, the Court reiterates that it does not consider itself bound by domestic scales and practices, although it may derive some assistance from them (see, among many other authorities, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, § 77, Series A no. 316-B, and Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 98, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 21055/03
It is not the Court's function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 35, ECHR 1999-III; Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 45, Series A no. 140). - EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 21055/03
It further reiterates that although Article 6 § 1 obliges courts to give reasons for their decisions, it cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every argument (see Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, 19 April 1994, § 61, Series A no. 288).