Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04, 35122/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2011,57259
EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04, 35122/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,57259)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.07.2011 - 32181/04, 35122/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,57259)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Juli 2011 - 32181/04, 35122/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,57259)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,57259) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (18)Neu Zitiert selbst (16)

  • EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

    I.D. v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    The Court has therefore found violations of Article 6 § 1 in cases where the domestic courts considered themselves bound by the prior findings of administrative bodies which were decisive for the outcome of the cases before them, without examining the issues independently (see, amongst many authorities, Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, §§ 69-70, Series A no. 179; Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, § 46 and §§ 50-55, Reports 1996-VI; I.D. v. Bulgaria, no. 43578/98, §§ 50-55, 28 April 2005; Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, §§ 99-108 ECHR 2005-XII (extracts); Tsfayo, cited above; and Druzstevní zálozna Pria and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 72034/01, § 112-115, 31 July 2008).
  • EGMR, 19.06.2013 - 72034/01

    DRUZSTEVNÍ ZÁLOZNA PRIA AND OTHERS AND ANOTHER CASE AGAINST THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    The Court has therefore found violations of Article 6 § 1 in cases where the domestic courts considered themselves bound by the prior findings of administrative bodies which were decisive for the outcome of the cases before them, without examining the issues independently (see, amongst many authorities, Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, §§ 69-70, Series A no. 179; Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, § 46 and §§ 50-55, Reports 1996-VI; I.D. v. Bulgaria, no. 43578/98, §§ 50-55, 28 April 2005; Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, §§ 99-108 ECHR 2005-XII (extracts); Tsfayo, cited above; and Druzstevní zálozna Pria and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 72034/01, § 112-115, 31 July 2008).
  • EGMR, 11.06.2002 - 36042/97

    WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    The Court reiterates that discrimination, for the purposes of both Article 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention, means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in relevantly similar situations (see Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV).
  • EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 29865/96

    Diskriminierung türkischer Ehefrauen durch Verpflichtung zur Tragung des Namens

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    It must be established that other persons in an analogous or relevantly similar situation enjoy preferential treatment and that this distinction is discriminatory (see Unal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865/96, § 49, 16 November 2004).
  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    It further emphasises that it is particularly conscious of the vital importance of combating racial and gender discrimination in all its forms and manifestations (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 145, ECHR 2005-VII).
  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

    HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    Such are the demands of pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness, without which there is no "democratic society" (see Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49, Series A no. 24, and Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 37, Series A no. 298).
  • EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90

    FISCHER c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    This has been the case, for example, where upon judicial review the applicants" submissions on their merits or grounds of appeal were examined point by point, without the court having to decline jurisdiction in replying to them or in ascertaining various facts (see inter alia, Zumtobel, § 32, cited above; Fischer v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 34, Series A no. 312; and Bryan, § 47, Müller and Potocka, §§ 56-58, cited above; see also the Commission decisions in Kristavcnik - Reutterer v. Austria, no. 22475/93, 10 September 1993; ISKCON and 8 others v. the United Kingdom, no. 20490/92, 8 March 1994; Stefan v. the United Kingdom, no. 29419/95, 9 December 1997; Wickramsinghe v. the United Kingdom, 9 December 1997 no. 31503/96; and X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 28530/95, 19 January 1998).
  • EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9063/80

    GILLOW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    As regards the objective test, the Court observes that the mere fact that a judge has been involved in other proceedings concerning the same parties is not in itself reasonably capable of giving rise to legitimate doubts as to his or her impartiality (see, for example, Gillow v. the United Kingdom, 24 November 1986, Series A no. 109, p. 28, § 73; Schmid v. Austria, no. 11831/85, Commission decision of 9 December 1987, Decisions and Reports (DR) 54, p. 144; Krone-Verlag GmbH and Mediaprint Anzeigen GmbH & Co KG v. Austria, no. 28977/95, Commission decision of 21 May 1997, unreported; Galya Pavlova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 39855/03, 14 October 2004; and Anguelov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 45963/99, 14 December 2004).
  • EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

    JERSILD v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    Such are the demands of pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness, without which there is no "democratic society" (see Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49, Series A no. 24, and Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 37, Series A no. 298).
  • EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

    Obermeier ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
    The Court has therefore found violations of Article 6 § 1 in cases where the domestic courts considered themselves bound by the prior findings of administrative bodies which were decisive for the outcome of the cases before them, without examining the issues independently (see, amongst many authorities, Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, §§ 69-70, Series A no. 179; Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, § 46 and §§ 50-55, Reports 1996-VI; I.D. v. Bulgaria, no. 43578/98, §§ 50-55, 28 April 2005; Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, §§ 99-108 ECHR 2005-XII (extracts); Tsfayo, cited above; and Druzstevní zálozna Pria and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 72034/01, § 112-115, 31 July 2008).
  • EGMR, 28.06.2001 - 24699/94

    VgT VEREIN GEGEN TIERFABRIKEN c. SUISSE

  • EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15963/90

    GRADINGER c. AUTRICHE

  • EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86

    ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA

  • EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13914/88

    INFORMATIONSVEREIN LENTIA AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA

  • EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75

    ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

    BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

  • EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 29295/16

    FRANZ v. GERMANY

    The Court has found in a number of cases, in which the tribunal in question did not have full jurisdiction as such but had examined the relevant issues raised before it, that the judicial review was sufficient (see Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05, §§ 156-159, 21 July 2011, with further references).
  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 11.02.2021 - C-579/19

    Food Standards Agency

    80 Vgl. Urteil des EGMR vom 21. Juli 2011, Sigma Radio Television Ltd/Zypern (CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD003218104, Nrn. 158 bis 169, insbesondere Nrn. 159 und 161).

    82 Vgl. Urteil des EGMR vom 21. Juli 2011, Sigma Radio Television Ltd/Zypern (CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD003218104, Nr. 157).

  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 10.04.2018 - C-89/17

    Generalanwalt Bobek: Kehrt ein Unionsbürger in seinen Herkunftsmitgliedstaat

    74 Urteil des EGMR vom 21. Juli 2011, Sigma Radio Television/Zypern, CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD003218104, § 154 und die zitierte Rechtsprechung.
  • EGMR, 23.01.2023 - 61435/19

    Verstoß gegen Meinungsfreiheit: Geschichten über gleichgeschlechtliche

    It has also accepted that various limitations on advertising aimed at children could be justified, in view of the vulnerability of children as consumers (see Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05, §§ 14-16 and 200-01, 21 July 2011).
  • EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 43800/12

    TSANOVA-GECHEVA c. BULGARIE

    En ce qui concerne plus particulièrement l'étendue du contrôle juridictionnel, le Gouvernement se réfère aux principes établis par la jurisprudence de la Cour dans l'arrêt Sigma Radio Television Ltd c. Chypre (nos 32181/04 et 35122/05, 21 juillet 2011) et rappelle que l'article 6 ne confère pas aux autorités judiciaires la tâche de substituer leur décision à celle de l'administration.

    L'affaire concerne donc l'intensité du contrôle opéré par les juridictions internes sur la discrétion exercée par l'administration (à l'instar des arrêts Zumtobel c. Autriche, 21 septembre 1993, §§ 31-32, série A no 268-A, Bryan c. Royaume-Uni, 22 novembre 1995, §§ 43-47, série A no 335-A, Potocka et autres c. Pologne, no 33776/96, §§ 77-78, CEDH 2001-X, Sigma Radio Television Ltd c. Chypre, nos 32181/04 et 35122/05, §§ 151-169, 21 juillet 2011, et Galina Kostova, c. Bulgarie, no 36181/05, §§ 58-65, 12 novembre 2013).

  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 26.06.2012 - C-199/11

    Nach Ansicht des Generalanwalts Cruz Villalón steht die Charta der Grundrechte

    51 bis 55, und Sigma Radio Television Ltd/Zypern, Nrn. 32181/04 und 35122/05 (Sect. 5) (Eng) - (21.7.11), Randnrn.
  • EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 7183/11

    LETINCIC v. CROATIA

    It is sufficient to note that the court has the power to annul the challenged administrative act; whether the merits of the dispute are then decided by the court itself or by the competent administrative body does not affect that conclusion (see Zumtobel v. Austria, 21 September 1993, § 32, Series A no. 268-A, and Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05, § 153, 21 July 2011).
  • EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 35599/20

    JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND

    The Court has established the following standard under Article 6: "where an adjudicatory body determining disputes over "civil rights and obligations" does not comply with Article 6 § 1 in some respect, no violation of the Convention can be found if the proceedings before that body are subject to subsequent control by a judicial body that has "full jurisdiction" and does provide the guarantees of Article 6 § 1" (see Fazia Ali v. the United Kingdom, no. 40378/10, 20 October 2015; see also, among other authorities, Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, § 29, Series A no. 58; Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05, § 15, 21 July 2011; and Gautrin and Others v. France, 20 May 1998, § 57, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III).
  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 02.02.2021 - C-194/19

    Belgischer Staat (Éléments postérieurs à la décision de transfert) - Vorlage zur

    33 EGMR, 21. Oktober 2011 (CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD003218104, §§ 151 bis 157).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2021 - 72437/11

    DONEV c. BULGARIE

    Sur l'étendue du contrôle juridictionnel opéré par la Cour administrative suprême sur les décisions du CSM 87. La Cour rappelle que, selon sa jurisprudence, afin d'évaluer si, dans un cas donné, les juridictions internes ont effectué un contrôle d'une étendue suffisante, la Cour doit prendre en considération les compétences attribuées à la juridiction en question et des éléments tels que: a) l'objet de la décision attaquée, plus particulièrement si celle-ci a trait à un domaine spécifique exigeant des connaissances spécialisées ou si, et dans quelle mesure, elle implique l'exercice du pouvoir discrétionnaire de l'administration ; b) la méthode suivie pour parvenir à cette décision et, en particulier, les garanties procédurales existantes dans le cadre de la procédure devant l'autorité administrative ; et c) la teneur du litige, y compris les moyens de recours, tant souhaités que réellement développés (Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá, précité, § 179, Tsanova-Gecheva c. Bulgarie, no 43800/12, § 98, 15 septembre 2015, et Sigma Radio Television Ltd c. Chypre, nos 32181/04 et 35122/05, § 154, 21 juillet 2011).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 30745/18

    COTORA c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 64735/14

    BIAGIOLI v. SAN MARINO

  • EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 36181/05

    GALINA KOSTOVA v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 09.02.2023 - 58951/18

    C8 (CANAL 8) c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 18952/18

    GLOVELI v. GEORGIA

  • EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 39664/12

    DE LAENDER ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 34376/13

    MONACO c. ITALIE

  • EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 14139/09

    SA PATRONALE HYPOTHÉCAIRE c. BELGIQUE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht