Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHAHANOV AND PALFREEMAN v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SHAHANOV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 35365/12, 69125/12
• EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 35365/12

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 31611/96

  NIKULA c. FINLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 35365/12

  Moreover, the limits of acceptable criticism with regard to public officials may in some circumstances be wider than in relation to private individuals (see Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-II; Steur v. the Netherlands, no. 39657/98, § 40, ECHR 2003-XI; and Mariapori v. Finland, no. 37751/07, § 56, 6 July 2010).
• EGMR, 28.10.2003 - 39657/98

  Meinungsfreiheit von Rechtsanwälten (Bedeutung der Rechtsanwälte für das …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 35365/12

  Moreover, the limits of acceptable criticism with regard to public officials may in some circumstances be wider than in relation to private individuals (see Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-II; Steur v. the Netherlands, no. 39657/98, § 40, ECHR 2003-XI; and Mariapori v. Finland, no. 37751/07, § 56, 6 July 2010).
• EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

  PALOMO SÁNCHEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 35365/12

  28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 and 28964/06, § 67, ECHR 2011).

 
• EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 17155/03

  COUTANT v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 35365/12

  The statements were not made publicly (see Bezymyannyy, § 39, Siryk, § 45, and Marin Kostov, § 46, all cited above), for instance verbally in front of members of the public (contrast Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, § 33, ECHR 1999-I), or in letters addressed or made available to the public or the media (contrast Coutant v. France (dec.), no. 17155/03, 24 January 2008, and Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 140, 23 April 2015).
• EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 63767/00

  PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 35365/12

  Nor were the statements made outside the proper channels of complaint (contrast Puzinas v. Lithuania (no. 2), no. 63767/00, §§ 30 and 34, 9 January 2007).
• EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 37751/07

  MARIAPORI v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 35365/12

  Moreover, the limits of acceptable criticism with regard to public officials may in some circumstances be wider than in relation to private individuals (see Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-II; Steur v. the Netherlands, no. 39657/98, § 40, ECHR 2003-XI; and Mariapori v. Finland, no. 37751/07, § 56, 6 July 2010).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 25716/94

  JANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 35365/12

  The statements were not made publicly (see Bezymyannyy, § 39, Siryk, § 45, and Marin Kostov, § 46, all cited above), for instance verbally in front of members of the public (contrast Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, § 33, ECHR 1999-I), or in letters addressed or made available to the public or the media (contrast Coutant v. France (dec.), no. 17155/03, 24 January 2008, and Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 140, 23 April 2015).
• EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 23954/10

  Zur Meinungsfreiheit in Ungarn

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 35365/12

  The Court's case-law draws a clear distinction between criticism and insult in terms of whether sanctions may be justified for such statements (see Skalka v. Poland, no. 43425/98, § 34, 27 May 2003; Uj v. Hungary, no. 23954/10, § 20, 19 July 2011; and Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos.