Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 5076/05, 25573/05, 30076/05, 41335/05, 1399/06, 36533/06, 45149/06, 9564/07, 14928/07, 44630/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 5076/05, 25573/05, 30076/05, 41335/05, 1399/06, 36533/06, 45149/06, 9564/07, 14928/07, 44630/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,20734)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.07.2016 - 5076/05, 25573/05, 30076/05, 41335/05, 1399/06, 36533/06, 45149/06, 9564/07, 14928/07, 44630/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,20734)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Juli 2016 - 5076/05, 25573/05, 30076/05, 41335/05, 1399/06, 36533/06, 45149/06, 9564/07, 14928/07, 44630/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,20734)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,20734) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 73359/10
ERGEZEN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 5076/05
The decisive element for the Court to determine while assessing the locus standi of persons wishing to pursue the proceedings on behalf of a late applicant is whether those people, in principle, can claim a legitimate interest in requesting the Court to deal with the case on the basis of the applicant's wish to exercise his or her individual and personal right to lodge an application with the Court (see Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, § 29, 8 April 2014). - EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 55929/00
MARIE-LOUISE LOYEN ET AUTRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 5076/05
The Court has already, in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, examined and confirmed the locus standi of their heirs or close relatives to pursue the proceedings before the Court, including in cases brought under Article 6 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, §§ 48-50, ECHR 2009 and Marie-Louise Loyen and Bruneel v. France, no. 55929/00, § 29, 5 July 2005). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 5076/05
Turning to the examination of the present cases, the Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).