Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SYDANMAKI v. FINLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 14, Art. 17, P12 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR - 19993/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, §§ 69-70, ECHR 2010- with further references).
• EGMR - 21819/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, §§ 69-70, ECHR 2010- with further references).
• EGMR - 14163/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, §§ 69-70, ECHR 2010- with further references).

 
• EGMR - 13466/03

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, §§ 69-70, ECHR 2010- with further references).
• EGMR - 10200/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, §§ 69-70, ECHR 2010- with further references).
• EuGH, 12.09.2002 - C-351/00

  Niemi

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  Meanwhile, following the judgment of 12 September 2002 by the European Court of Justice in the case of Pirkko Niemi C-351/00 in which it was found that the fact that the applicant's pensionable age was set higher than that of men doing the same work was in breach of the principle of equal pay laid down by Article 141 of the EC Treaty, the Insurance Court reached the same conclusion in its decision concerning P.N. on 25 February 2003.
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  Thus the complaint intended to be made subsequently to the Court must first have been made - at least in substance - to the appropriate domestic body, and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V, and Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, §§ 69-70, ECHR 2010- with further references).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  Where there are several effective remedies available, it is for the applicant to select which remedy to pursue in order to comply with the requirements of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 23, Series A no. 32) and he or she need not exhaust more than one (see YaÄ?cı and Sargın v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, §§ 42-44, Series A no. 319-A).
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 45809/06

  Where there are several effective remedies available, it is for the applicant to select which remedy to pursue in order to comply with the requirements of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 23, Series A no. 32) and he or she need not exhaust more than one (see YaÄ?cı and Sargın v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, §§ 42-44, Series A no. 319-A).
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere