Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 7390/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,63550
EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 7390/07 (https://dejure.org/2010,63550)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.09.2010 - 7390/07 (https://dejure.org/2010,63550)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. September 2010 - 7390/07 (https://dejure.org/2010,63550)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63550) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 08.02.2000 - 32819/96

    CABALLERO v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 7390/07
    The applicant's counsel made extensive submissions in support of the application, with particular reference to the Court's judgment in Caballero v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32819/96, ECHR 2000-II. She argued that once the time limit under the 1987 Regulations had expired and was not extended, a defendant should be admitted to bail.

    They distinguished the applicant's case from the cases of Caballero v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32819/96, ECHR 2000-II and S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 39360/98, 19 June 2001 as those cases were concerned with the previous version of section 25, which excluded the possibility of any consideration by the judge of pre-trial release.

  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 7390/07
    Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110, ECHR 2000-XI; and Contrada, cited above, § 54).
  • EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

    Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention,

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 7390/07
    However, the Court will also bear in mind that as at 7 June 2002, the applicant had already been in detention for a period of six months (see, mutatis mutandis, Jablonski v. Poland, no. 33492/96, § 66, 21 December 2000; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 111, ECHR 2002-VI; and Stasaitis v. Lithuania, no. 47679/99, § 80, 21 March 2002).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 65655/01

    Menschenrechte: Überlange Untersuchungshaft, "La Belle"

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 7390/07
    In assessing whether the "special diligence" requirement has been met, the Court will have regard to periods of unjustified delay, to the overall complexity of the proceedings and to any steps taken by the authorities to speed up proceedings to ensure that the overall length of detention remains "reasonable" (see, for example, Contrada, cited above, §§ 66-67; and Chraidi v. Germany, no. 65655/01, § 42-45, ECHR 2006-XII).
  • EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88

    W. c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 7390/07
    While the applicant was entitled to be represented by legal counsel of his own choosing and no blame can be attributed to him for insisting on the presence of his preferred counsel at trial, he must nonetheless bear the reasonable consequences of his choices on the overall length of his pre-trial detention (see, mutatis mutandis, W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, § 42, Series A no. 254-A).
  • EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 12718/87

    CLOOTH v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 7390/07
    The Court notes in particular that in the applicant's case, the previous convictions arose from an incident which was factually very similar to the alleged offences which took place in 2000 and can therefore be considered comparable both in nature and degree of seriousness to the offences charged in 2001 (see paragraph 64 above and compare and contrast Clooth v. Belgium, 12 December 1991, § 40, Series A no. 225).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht