Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 53195/16, 60130/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,41289) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IGNJATIC v. CROATIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
IGNJATIC v. CROATIA and 1 other application
Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15963/90
GRADINGER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 53195/16
The subsequent criminal proceedings against the applicant, on the other hand, were conducted precisely with the aim of addressing the consequence of his failure to comply with fire-safety regulations, that is, to penalise his conduct which caused extensive pecuniary damage to property (compare and contrast Gradinger v. Austria, 23 October 1995, § 54, Series A no. 328-C). - EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 14939/03
Sergeï Zolotoukhine ./. Russland
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 53195/16
The Court's assessment General principles 21. Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention is understood as prohibiting the prosecution or trial of a second "offence" in so far as it arose from identical facts or facts which were substantially the same (see Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 82, ECHR 2009; Margu?. v. Croatia [GC], no. 4455/10, § 114, ECHR 2014; and A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. - EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 24130/11
A ET B c. NORVÈGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 53195/16
24130/11 and 29758/11, § 108, 15 November 2016).