Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 19164/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64684) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DIYA 97 v. UKRAINE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 19164/04
- EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 19164/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99
RIABYKH c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 19164/04
One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which presupposes respect for the principle of res judicata, that is the principle of the finality of judgments (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-X). - EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 21845/03
GOROU c. GRECE (N° 3)
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 19164/04
This principle applies both ways, not only in respect of litigants but also in respect of the national courts (see, among other authorities, Cañete de Goñi v. Spain, no. 55782/00, § 36, ECHR 2002-VIII; Gorou v. Greece (no. 3), no. 21845/03, § 27, 22 June 2006; Miholapa v. Latvia, no. 61655/00, § 24, 31 May 2007; and Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 99, ECHR 2009-...). - EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 12686/03
Gorou ./. Griechenland
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 19164/04
The Court further notes that nothing prevented V. from trying legitimate avenues to protect his interests, either within the existing commercial proceedings (by way of applying to the General Prosecutor for an intervention (a similar course of action has been analysed by the Court in the recent case of Gorou v. Greece (no. 2) ([GC], no. 12686/03, §§ 27-42, ECHR 2009-...)), or by means of a separate civil action. - EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00
Andrejeva ./. Lettland
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 19164/04
This principle applies both ways, not only in respect of litigants but also in respect of the national courts (see, among other authorities, Cañete de Goñi v. Spain, no. 55782/00, § 36, ECHR 2002-VIII; Gorou v. Greece (no. 3), no. 21845/03, § 27, 22 June 2006; Miholapa v. Latvia, no. 61655/00, § 24, 31 May 2007; and Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 99, ECHR 2009-...). - EGMR, 15.10.2002 - 55782/00
CAÑETE DE GOÑII c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 19164/04
This principle applies both ways, not only in respect of litigants but also in respect of the national courts (see, among other authorities, Cañete de Goñi v. Spain, no. 55782/00, § 36, ECHR 2002-VIII; Gorou v. Greece (no. 3), no. 21845/03, § 27, 22 June 2006; Miholapa v. Latvia, no. 61655/00, § 24, 31 May 2007; and Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 99, ECHR 2009-...).