Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SALIYEV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 10 (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SALIYEV v. RUSSIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 35016/03
• EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 51501/99

  CHEREPKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  Even if their competence is limited (see, mutatis mutandis, Cherepkov v. Russia (dec.), no. 51501/99, ECHR 2000-I, where the Court analysed whether municipal bodies had "legislative power" within the meaning of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention), their powers cannot be characterised as anything other than "public".
• EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 53984/00

  RADIO FRANCE ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  The Court points out that in Radio France and Others v. France ((dec.), no. 53984/00, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); see also Österreichischer Rundfunk v. Austria, no. 35841/02, §§ 46 et seq., 7 December 2006), the Court defined the applicable criteria as follows:.
• EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 35841/02

  ÖSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  The Court points out that in Radio France and Others v. France ((dec.), no. 53984/00, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); see also Österreichischer Rundfunk v. Austria, no. 35841/02, §§ 46 et seq., 7 December 2006), the Court defined the applicable criteria as follows:.

 
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90

  PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  As to the critical views expressed in the article, they were reasonably supported by the facts (see Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II) and were expressed in an acceptable form (see the Court's case-law on the "degree of exaggeration, or even provocation" permissible in political journalism, for example in Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 313, p. 19, § 38; see, by contrast, the cases of Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, § 67, ECHR 2001-I, and Constantinescu v. Romania, no. 28871/95, § 74, ECHR 2000-VIII).
• EGMR, 21.12.2004 - 61513/00

  BUSUIOC v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  Reporting on matters relating to the management of public resources lies at the core of the media's responsibility and the right of the public to receive information (see Busuioc v. Moldova, no. 61513/00, §§ 63-64 and 84, 21 December 2004, and CumpÇ?nÇ? and MazÇ?re v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 94-95, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 63995/00

  KUKALO v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  The municipal bodies are formed by the local population; they have wide-ranging powers in various areas of life, examples of which can be found in the Court's case-law concerning Russia (see, for example, Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 53, ECHR 2009-...; Kuimov v. Russia, no. 32147/04, § 30, 8 January 2009; and Kukalo v. Russia, no. 63995/00, § 33, 3 November 2005).
• EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 76836/01

  KIMLYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  The municipal bodies are formed by the local population; they have wide-ranging powers in various areas of life, examples of which can be found in the Court's case-law concerning Russia (see, for example, Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 53, ECHR 2009-...; Kuimov v. Russia, no. 32147/04, § 30, 8 January 2009; and Kukalo v. Russia, no. 63995/00, § 33, 3 November 2005).
• EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 5124/03

  GIZZATOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  Firstly, in a number of cases the Court has regarded the debts of municipal enterprises as State debts (see, for example, Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, 13 January 2005).
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 1387/04

  YERSHOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  In a very recent case, also concerning State responsibility for the debts of a municipal enterprise, the Court held that local (that is, municipal) authorities were linked to the State administration (see Yershova v. Russia, no. 1387/04, §§ 54 et seq., 8 April 2010).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 13936/02

  MANOLE ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  The Court's approach may be different in a situation where the press is, de jure or de facto, in the hands of a monopoly, especially a Government monopoly (see the very detailed analysis of the Convention case-law in this regard in Manole and Others v. Moldova, no. 13936/02, §§ 95 et seq., ECHR 2009-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY
• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

  DALBAN v. ROMANIA

• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10

  REMUSZKO v. POLAND

  The State's obligation to ensure the individual's freedom of expression does not give private citizens or organisations an unfettered right of access to the media in order to put forward opinions (see, mutatis mutandis, Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179/98, § 61, 10 July 2003; Saliyev v. Russia, no. 35016/03, § 52, 21 October 2010).