Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 35489/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,51562) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MARIC v. SLOVENIA
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 28541/95
PELLEGRIN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 35489/02
As to the applicability of Article 6, the Court recalls that disputes between administrative authorities and employees who occupy posts involving participation in the exercise of powers conferred by public law do not attract the application of Article 6 § 1. However, regard being had to the fact that at the time the applicant sustained his injuries he was a conscript, the Court considers that he was not the holder of a post "wielding a portion of the State's sovereign power" (see, a contrario, Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, § 67, ECHR 1999-VII, and Gorsek v. Slovenia, no. 75813/01, 30 March 2006). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 35489/02
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 35489/02
The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 30.03.2006 - 75813/01
GORSEK v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 35489/02
As to the applicability of Article 6, the Court recalls that disputes between administrative authorities and employees who occupy posts involving participation in the exercise of powers conferred by public law do not attract the application of Article 6 § 1. However, regard being had to the fact that at the time the applicant sustained his injuries he was a conscript, the Court considers that he was not the holder of a post "wielding a portion of the State's sovereign power" (see, a contrario, Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, § 67, ECHR 1999-VII, and Gorsek v. Slovenia, no. 75813/01, 30 March 2006).
- EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 7709/06
PLUT AND BICANIC-PLUT v. SLOVENIA
Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Sramel v. Slovenia, no. 39154/02, §§ 21-23, 13 December 2007; Palamarchuk v. Ukraine, no. 28585/04, §§ 45-47, 15 July 2010; and Maric v. Slovenia, no. 35489/02, §§ 21-23, 21 December 2006), the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings, in particular before the first-instance court, was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.