Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.01.2002 - 42011/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,45853) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OYSTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 28901/95
ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2002 - 42011/98
There was a risk that the Court of Appeal might have been unconsciously influenced by the jury's verdict of guilty into underestimating the significance of the evidence relevant to credibility (referring to Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC] no. 28901/95, ECHR 2000-II, § 65). - EGMR, 02.05.2000 - 35718/97
CONDRON c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2002 - 42011/98
This case could in their view be distinguished from the case of Condron v. the United Kingdom (no. 35718/97 (Sect. 3) ECHR-V, §§ 62-66), where the defect in the trial was found to cast doubt on the safety of the conviction by this Court and they rely on the case of Edwards v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 249-B, §§ 34 and 39) as showing that defects in a trial can by cured by an appeal hearing. - EGMR, 26.11.1992 - 11519/85
FRANCESCO LOMBARDO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2002 - 42011/98
This case could in their view be distinguished from the case of Condron v. the United Kingdom (no. 35718/97 (Sect. 3) ECHR-V, §§ 62-66), where the defect in the trial was found to cast doubt on the safety of the conviction by this Court and they rely on the case of Edwards v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 249-B, §§ 34 and 39) as showing that defects in a trial can by cured by an appeal hearing.