Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MITIC v. SERBIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Mitic v. Serbia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95

  TANLI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08

  Furthermore, the autopsy report was detailed: it described both the internal and external features of JM's body and took histopathological samples which were analysed in detail (contrast Tanlı v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 150, ECHR 2001-III (extracts)).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08

  In all cases, however, the next-of-kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to the extent necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interest (see, for example, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 148, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08

  It is incumbent on the State to account for any injuries suffered in custody, which obligation is particularly stringent when an individual dies (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII).

 
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08

  The Court reiterates that whenever a detainee dies in suspicious circumstances, Article 2 requires the authorities to conduct an independent and impartial official investigation that satisfies certain minimum standards as to effectiveness (see, for example, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, §§ 69-73, ECHR 2002-II, and Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, § 88, 5 July 2005).
• EGMR, 07.01.2003 - 57420/00

  YOUNGER contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08

  Furthermore, he never complained about the quality of the medical assistance or the therapy received nor was he refused access to a specialist (compare Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00, ECHR 2003-I).
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 49790/99

  TRUBNIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08

  The Court reiterates that whenever a detainee dies in suspicious circumstances, Article 2 requires the authorities to conduct an independent and impartial official investigation that satisfies certain minimum standards as to effectiveness (see, for example, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, §§ 69-73, ECHR 2002-II, and Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, § 88, 5 July 2005).
• EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 6414/02

  KOSEVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08

  They must be assessed on the basis of all relevant facts and with regard to the practical realities of investigation work (see Koseva v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 6414/02, 22 June 2010).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08

  In the light of the importance of the protection afforded by Article 2, the Court must subject deprivation of life to the most careful scrutiny, taking into consideration not only the actions of State agents but also all the surrounding circumstances (see, among other authorities, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-47, Series A no. 324).

• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 78103/14

  FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL

  In this regard, authorities must discharge their duties in a manner compatible with the rights and freedoms of the individual concerned and in such a way as to diminish the opportunities for self-harm, without infringing personal autonomy (see, mutatis mutandis, Mitic v. Serbia, no. 31963/08, § 47, 22 January 2013, and Jagiello v. Poland (dec) [Committee], no.21782/15, § 23, 24 January 2017).
• EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 23405/16

  S.F. c. SUISSE

  À cet égard, les autorités doivent s'acquitter de leurs tâches de manière compatible avec les droits et libertés de l'individu concerné et de façon à diminuer les risques qu'une personne se nuise à elle-même, et ce sans empiéter sur l'autonomie individuelle (voir, mutatis mutandis, Mitic c. Serbie, no 31963/08, § 47, 22 janvier 2013).
• EGMR, 19.03.2020 - 41603/13

  FABRIS ET PARZIALE c. ITALIE

  Des mesures et précautions générales peuvent être prises afin de diminuer les risques d'automutilation sans empiéter sur l'autonomie individuelle (voir, mutatis mutandis, Mitic c. Serbie, no 31963/08, § 47, 22 janvier 2013).
• EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20

  ZEMZAMI v. ITALY

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including one brought against Italy, its practice concerning the positive obligations under Article 2 to protect an individual from self-harm in detention (see, for example, Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 90, ECHR 2001-III; Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, 5 July 2005; Renolde v. France, no. 5608/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts); Ketreb v. France, no. 38447/09, 19 July 2012; Volk v. Slovenia, no. 62120/09, 13 December 2012; Mitic v. Serbia, no. 31963/08, 22 January 2013; Isenc v. France, no. 58828/13, 4 February 2016; S.F. v. Switzerland, no. 23405/16, § 98, 30 June 2020; and Citraro and Molino, cited above).
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 46863/09

  BARANSKA v. POLAND

  Thus, there is no indication that the hospital staff knew or ought to have known that the applicant's daughter posed a real and immediate risk of suicide (compare and contrast, Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 93, ECHR 2001-III; Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, § 75, 5 July 2005; Perevedentsevy v. Russia, no. 39583/05, 24 April 2014; and Mitic v. Serbia, no. 31963/08, 22 January 2013).