Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LALMAHOMED v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08
• EGMR, 26.09.2012 - 26036/08
• EGMR - 26036/08 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 14.12.1999 - 34791/97

  KHALFAOUI c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Even so, a Contracting Party which provides for the possibility of an appeal is required to ensure that persons amenable to the law shall enjoy before the appellate court the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 6 (see the above-cited Delcourt judgment, loc. cit., and De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 32, Series A no. 86; as more recent examples, Khalfaoui v. France, no. 34791/97, § 37, ECHR 1999-IX; and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 122, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 22.06.2000 - 32492/96

  COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, § 117, ECHR 2000-VII; more recently and mutatis mutandis, Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 105, ECHR 2006-III).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Even so, a Contracting Party which provides for the possibility of an appeal is required to ensure that persons amenable to the law shall enjoy before the appellate court the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 6 (see the above-cited Delcourt judgment, loc. cit., and De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 32, Series A no. 86; as more recent examples, Khalfaoui v. France, no. 34791/97, § 37, ECHR 1999-IX; and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 122, ECHR 2000-XI).

 
• EGMR, 25.05.2004 - 994/03

  CORNELIS c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Moreover, as long as the resulting decision is based on a full and thorough evaluation of the relevant factors (Monnell and Morris, § 69), it will escape the scrutiny of the Court; in this connection, the Court reiterates that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by the national courts (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; and Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)), as it is not a court of appeal - or, as is sometimes said, a "fourth instance" - from these courts (see, among many other authorities, Kemmache v. France (no. 3), 24 November 1994, § 44, Series A no. 296-C; and Melnychuk v. Ukraine (dec), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX).
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 28743/03

  MELNITCHOUK c. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Moreover, as long as the resulting decision is based on a full and thorough evaluation of the relevant factors (Monnell and Morris, § 69), it will escape the scrutiny of the Court; in this connection, the Court reiterates that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by the national courts (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; and Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)), as it is not a court of appeal - or, as is sometimes said, a "fourth instance" - from these courts (see, among many other authorities, Kemmache v. France (no. 3), 24 November 1994, § 44, Series A no. 296-C; and Melnychuk v. Ukraine (dec), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX).
• EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 14810/02

  RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  The right to the fair administration of justice holds so prominent a place in a democratic society that it cannot be sacrificed for the sake of expedience (see Delcourt, loc. cit.; more recently, Ryakib Biryukov v. Russia, no. 14810/02, § 37, ECHR 2008-...; and Ramanauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 74420/01, § 53, ECHR 2008-...).
• EGMR, 05.02.2008 - 74420/01

  Recht auf ein faires Strafverfahren (Tatprovokation; agent provocateur; V-Mann; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  The right to the fair administration of justice holds so prominent a place in a democratic society that it cannot be sacrificed for the sake of expedience (see Delcourt, loc. cit.; more recently, Ryakib Biryukov v. Russia, no. 14810/02, § 37, ECHR 2008-...; and Ramanauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 74420/01, § 53, ECHR 2008-...).
• EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 32165/02

  SIBGATULLIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  However, it is quite possible that leave-to-appeal proceedings may comply with the requirements of Article 6, even though the appellant be not given an opportunity to be heard in person by the appeal court, provided that he or she had at least the opportunity to be heard by a first-instance court (see, in particular, Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 58, Series A no. 115; more recently, Sibgatullin v. Russia, no. 32165/02, § 35, 23 April 2009).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9562/81

  MONNELL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  However, it is quite possible that leave-to-appeal proceedings may comply with the requirements of Article 6, even though the appellant be not given an opportunity to be heard in person by the appeal court, provided that he or she had at least the opportunity to be heard by a first-instance court (see, in particular, Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 58, Series A no. 115; more recently, Sibgatullin v. Russia, no. 32165/02, § 35, 23 April 2009).
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Even so, a Contracting Party which provides for the possibility of an appeal is required to ensure that persons amenable to the law shall enjoy before the appellate court the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 6 (see the above-cited Delcourt judgment, loc. cit., and De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 32, Series A no. 86; as more recent examples, Khalfaoui v. France, no. 34791/97, § 37, ECHR 1999-IX; and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 122, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87

  PHILIS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 24.11.1994 - 17621/91

  KEMMACHE v. FRANCE (No. 3)