Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 41119/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,53917) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RUDYSH v. UKRAINE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 17, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 21287/02
PRYSTAVSKA contre l'UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 41119/07
In such circumstances, the recourse to the Supreme Court to challenge proceedings which had been brought to an end by a final decision must be seen as akin to a request to reopen those proceedings by means of the extraordinary transitional remedy provided for by the Law of 21 June 2001 (see Prystavska v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21287/02, ECHR 2002-X). - EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 70767/01
PAVLYULYNETS v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 41119/07
The Court notes that the proceedings in the applicant's case began on 30 November 2000 and ended on 23 May 2007, but it will take into account only those periods when the case was actually pending before the courts, thus excluding the periods between the adoption of the final judgments and their revocation in the course of the extraordinary proceedings (see Markin v. Russia (dec.), no. 59502/00, 16 September 2004, and Pavlyulynets v. Ukraine, no. 70767/01, §§ 41-42, 6 September 2005). - EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 7984/77
PRETTO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 41119/07
The Court reiterates that a delay at some stage may be acceptable if the overall duration of the proceedings cannot be deemed excessive (see, for example, Pretto and Others v. Italy, 8 December 1983, § 37, Series A no. 71). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 41119/07
The Court recalls that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).