Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 49681/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,5212) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PERGAR v. CROATIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
PERGAR v. CROATIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03
NAFIYE ÇETIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 49681/16
Having regard to the Constitutional Court's decisions rendered as of 2019, which extensively implement the criteria established by the Court in assessing whether or not an investigation had been effective, including whether the authorities had acted with the required promptness and reasonable expedition (see, for instance, Nafiye Çetin and Others v. Turkey, no. 19180/03, § 42, 7 April 2009; and the Croatian Constitutional Court's decision U-IIIBi-4222/2018 of 5 November 2019 cited in Kusic and Others, § 55), the Court has no reason to doubt that the Constitutional Court will diligently examine the applicants' complaint. - EGMR, 10.12.2019 - 71667/17
KUSIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 49681/16
In the case of Kusic and Others v. Croatia ((dec.), no. 71667/17, 10 December 2019) the Court found that in 2019 a constitutional complaint had become an effective domestic remedy for complaints concerning ineffective investigations under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (ibid., §§ 93 and 99).