Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07, 28826/07, 34975/07, 5638/09, 29575/09, 66628/09, 75503/10, 4301/11, 9924/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07, 28826/07, 34975/07, 5638/09, 29575/09, 66628/09, 75503/10, 4301/11, 9924/11 (https://dejure.org/2016,5258)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22.03.2016 - 14313/07, 28826/07, 34975/07, 5638/09, 29575/09, 66628/09, 75503/10, 4301/11, 9924/11 (https://dejure.org/2016,5258)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22. März 2016 - 14313/07, 28826/07, 34975/07, 5638/09, 29575/09, 66628/09, 75503/10, 4301/11, 9924/11 (https://dejure.org/2016,5258)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,5258) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AKULIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 41418/04
KHOROSHENKO c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07
According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 159, ECHR 2015). - EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 54673/00
LATIF FUAT ÖZTÜRK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07
It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of their heirs or close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006, and Hanbayat v. Turkey, no. 18378/02, § 20, 17 July 2007). - EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00
KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07
The relevant domestic law governing the use of undercover operations at the material time is summed up in the Court's judgments in the cases of Lagutin and Others v. Russia (nos. 6228/09, 19123/09, 19678/07, 52340/08 and 7451/09, 24 April 2014); Veselov and Others v. Russia (nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012); Bannikova v. Russia (no. 18757/06, 14 October 2010); Vanyan v. Russia (no. 53203/99, 15 December 2005); and Khudobin v. Russia (no. 59696/00, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).
- EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 18757/06
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (Abgrenzung der unzulässigen Tatprovokation von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07
The relevant domestic law governing the use of undercover operations at the material time is summed up in the Court's judgments in the cases of Lagutin and Others v. Russia (nos. 6228/09, 19123/09, 19678/07, 52340/08 and 7451/09, 24 April 2014); Veselov and Others v. Russia (nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012); Bannikova v. Russia (no. 18757/06, 14 October 2010); Vanyan v. Russia (no. 53203/99, 15 December 2005); and Khudobin v. Russia (no. 59696/00, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07
The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case, his or her heirs may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX). - EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 6228/09
LAGUTIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07
The relevant domestic law governing the use of undercover operations at the material time is summed up in the Court's judgments in the cases of Lagutin and Others v. Russia (nos. 6228/09, 19123/09, 19678/07, 52340/08 and 7451/09, 24 April 2014); Veselov and Others v. Russia (nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012); Bannikova v. Russia (no. 18757/06, 14 October 2010); Vanyan v. Russia (no. 53203/99, 15 December 2005); and Khudobin v. Russia (no. 59696/00, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 18378/02
HANBAYAT v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07
It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of their heirs or close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006, and Hanbayat v. Turkey, no. 18378/02, § 20, 17 July 2007). - EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 23200/10
VESELOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07
The relevant domestic law governing the use of undercover operations at the material time is summed up in the Court's judgments in the cases of Lagutin and Others v. Russia (nos. 6228/09, 19123/09, 19678/07, 52340/08 and 7451/09, 24 April 2014); Veselov and Others v. Russia (nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012); Bannikova v. Russia (no. 18757/06, 14 October 2010); Vanyan v. Russia (no. 53203/99, 15 December 2005); and Khudobin v. Russia (no. 59696/00, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99
VANYAN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07
The relevant domestic law governing the use of undercover operations at the material time is summed up in the Court's judgments in the cases of Lagutin and Others v. Russia (nos. 6228/09, 19123/09, 19678/07, 52340/08 and 7451/09, 24 April 2014); Veselov and Others v. Russia (nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012); Bannikova v. Russia (no. 18757/06, 14 October 2010); Vanyan v. Russia (no. 53203/99, 15 December 2005); and Khudobin v. Russia (no. 59696/00, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).