Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STEFANOU v. GREECE

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 2954/07

  The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be reimbursed under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII, and Boicenco v. Moldova, no. 41088/05, § 176, 11 July 2006).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 2954/07

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 2954/07

  The next question which arises is whether the minimum level of severity required for a violation of Article 3 of the Convention can be regarded as having been attained in the instant case (see, among other authorities, Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 84, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 2954/07

  The Court reiterates that the "reasonableness" of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria set out in its case-law, especially the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 41088/05

  BOICENCO v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 2954/07

  The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be reimbursed under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII, and Boicenco v. Moldova, no. 41088/05, § 176, 11 July 2006).

• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 25018/10

  IBRAHIM DEMIRTAS c. TURQUIE

  Ces éléments, ainsi que les sentiments de crainte, d'angoisse et d'infériorité que le traitement litigieux a certainement inspirés à l'intéressé en raison de son jeune âge, doivent lui avoir causé des souffrances d'une gravité suffisante pour que les actes de la police soient qualifiés de traitements inhumains ou dégradants aux fins de l'article 3 (...) La Cour conclut qu'il y a eu violation de l'article 3'(Stefanou c. Grèce, no 2954/07, §§ 51-52, 22 avril 2010).
• EGMR, 25.01.2018 - 33349/10

  SIDIROPOULOS ET PAPAKOSTAS c. GRÈCE

  Ils invoquent à cet égard la jurisprudence de la Cour dans les affaires Stefanou c. Grèce (no 2954/07, 22 avril 2010) et Galotskin, précité).