Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GULMAMMADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - award Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 38798/07

  But the delay may not be such as to impair the essence of the right protected under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 9056/02

  RADANOVIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 38798/07

  In such situations, a wide margin of appreciation should be accorded to the respondent State (see, mutatis mutandis, Radanovic v. Croatia, no. 9056/02, § 49, 21 December 2006).
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 37763/04

  CEBOTARI AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 38798/07

  When the authorities are obliged to act in order to enforce a judgment and they fail to do so, their failure to take action can engage the State's responsibility under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Cebotari and Others v. Moldova, nos. 37763/04, 37712/04, 35247/04, 35178/04 and 34350/04, § 39, 27 January 2009).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

  RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 38798/07

  The Court reiterates that a "claim" can constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable (see Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, § 59, Series A no. 301-B).

• EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 32715/06

  Kübler ./. Deutschland

  Der Gerichtshof weist erneut darauf hin, dass Artikel 6 Abs. 1 jeder Person das "Recht auf ein Gericht" zusichert, was auch das Recht auf Umsetzung eines von einem Gericht gefällten rechtskräftigen Urteils einschließt (siehe u.v.a. Hornsby, a.a.O., Rdnr. 40; und Gulmammadova ./. Aserbaidschan, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 38798/07, Rdnr. 35, 22.
• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 51920/09

  BAKHSHIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The relevant domestic law is summarised in the Court's judgment in the case of Gulmammadova v. Azerbaijan (no. 38798/07, §§ 18-24, 22 April 2010).
• EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 42858/11

  HASANALI ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Housing Code of 1982, in force until 30 june 2009 20. Articles 10, 28, 48 and 51 of the Code are summarised in Gulmammadova v. Azerbaijan (no. 38798/07, § 18, 22 April 2010).

 
• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 27427/02

  LAZARENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  The Court has already found that a claim to a flat based on an occupancy voucher constitutes a "possession" falling within the ambit of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Akimova v. Azerbaijan, no. 19853/03, §§ 39-41, 27 September 2007; Gulmammadova v. Azerbaijan, no. 38798/07, § 44, 22 April 2010).
• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 7867/09

  GASIMOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The relevant domestic law is summarised in the Court's judgment in the case of Gulmammadova v. Azerbaijan (no. 38798/07, §§ 18-24, 22 April 2010).
• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 57745/11

  ARIF ISLAMZADE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declarations and finding in particular that the amount of compensation offered in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage does not constitute adequate and sufficient redress for the violations of the applicants" rights under the Convention (see, among many others, Gulmammadova v. Azerbaijan, no. 38798/07, §§ 51-63, 22 April 2010, and Zulfali Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 56547/10, §§ 21-37, 26 June 2012), the Court considers that the proposed declarations do not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of these applications (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, § 75, ECHR 2003-VI, and Magoch v. Poland, no. 29539/07, §§ 15-20, 2 February 2010).