Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 1291/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,69060) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VOLOSYUK v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 10, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2, Art. 1, Art. 14, Art. 17, Art. 53 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 1291/03
- EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 1291/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 54825/00
NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 1291/03
The relevant domestic law provisions concerning pre-trial detention and other preventive measures are set out in the Court's judgment of 5 April 2005 in the case of Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine (no. 54825/00, §§ 53-55, ECHR 2005). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 1291/03
In so far as the applicant complains of a violation of Article 13 of the Convention with respect of his complaints under Article 3, the Court recalls that according to its case-law, Article 13 does not require a remedy in domestic law for all claims alleging a breach of the Convention; the claim must be an arguable one (Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82
KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 1291/03
Nevertheless, a State cannot be held responsible for every shortcoming on the part of a lawyer appointed for legal aid purposes (see Kamasinski v. Austria, judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, p. 33, § 65).