Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TOPI v. ALBANIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Constitutional proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  TOPI v. ALBANIA and 5 other applications

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 30749/12

  HOKKELING v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 14816/08

  The Court further notes that although proceedings that take place in the accused's absence are not of themselves incompatible with Article 6 of the Convention, a denial of justice nevertheless undoubtedly occurs where a person convicted in absentia is unable subsequently to obtain from the court which has heard his case a fresh determination of the merits of the charge, in respect of both law and fact, where it has not been established that he or she has waived his or her right to appear and to defend him or herself (see Sejdovic, cited above, § 82 and Hokkeling v. the Netherlands, no. 30749/12, § 58, 14 February 2017).
• EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96

  BAUMANN v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 14816/08

  However, this rule is subject to exceptions, which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see, for example, Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V (extracts).

• EGMR - 52638/15 (anhängig)

  SHAHI v. ITALY

  (a) Did the judgment of the Court of Cassation (R.G. 6930/2014 of 21 April 2015 no. 588/2015) constitute an unjustified denial of the applicant's right of access to a new hearing on the merits (see Topi v. Albania, no. 14816/08, § 53, 22 May 2018)?.
• EGMR - 2903/19 (anhängig)

  AUSTIN v. PORTUGAL

  Having regard to the general principles concerning trial in absentia established by the Court (see Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, §§ 82 and 84, 1 March 2006; Shkalla v. Albania, no. 26866/05, §§ 66 et seq., 10 May 2011; and Topi v. Albania, no. 14816/08, §§ 53 et seq., 22 May 2018), did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against him, in accordance with Article 6 of the Convention ? In particular:.