Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.06.1999 - 39943/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,27540) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BONAPART v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.1999 - 39943/98
Referring to the Court's findings in the case of Edwards v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B), the applicant argues that if a trial is to be fair, the investigating and prosecution authorities must ultimately disclose to the defence in criminal proceedings all investigation results which are of importance.1 of the Convention that the prosecution authorities disclose to the defence all material evidence for or against the accused (see the Edwards v. United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, p. 35, § 36).
- EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 12489/86
Windisch ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.1999 - 39943/98
The subsequent use of information provided by such sources by a trial court to found a conviction may, however, raise issues under the Convention (see the Windisch v. Austria judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 186; and Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238). - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.1999 - 39943/98
The subsequent use of information provided by such sources by a trial court to found a conviction may, however, raise issues under the Convention (see the Windisch v. Austria judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 186; and Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238).