Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  METELITSA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 41, Art. 6 Abs. 1+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (Convention proceedings) - claim dismissed (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 33132/02
• EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 33132/02

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 14861/89

  LALA c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 33132/02

  It is also of crucial importance for the fairness of the criminal justice system that the accused be adequately defended, both at first-instance and on appeal (see Lala v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 297-A, p. 13, § 33).
• EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 11170/84

  Brandstetter ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 33132/02

  This means that both prosecution and defence must be given the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed and the evidence adduced by the other party (see Brandstetter v. Austria, judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, p. 27, §§ 66-67).

• EGMR - 12149/07

  BUDRIN v. RUSSIA

  Given that the applicant was not brought to the appeal hearing in the criminal case against him while the prosecutor attended and made oral submissions, was the applicant able to defend himself, as required by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention (see Metelitsa v. Russia, no. 33132/02, §§ 30-35, 22 June 2006)?.