Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AL-ZAWATIA v. SWEDEN

  Art. 3, Art. 8 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 50068/08

  The Court reiterates that the purpose of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity to prevent or put right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among many other authorities, Remli v. France, 23 April 1996, § 33, Reports 1996-II, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 02.08.2001 - 54273/00

  BOULTIF v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 50068/08

  Although the specific criteria as to the seriousness of the difficulties which a spouse is likely to encounter in the country to which an applicant is to be expelled notably relates to complaints under Article 8 of the Convention in the assessment of whether an expulsion measure is necessary in a democratic society and proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see, for example, Boultif v. Switzerland, no. 54273/00, § 48, ECHR 2001-IX), in the present case it does add to the understanding that the applicant is not excluded from receiving care and support from his family in the country of destination.
• EGMR, 29.06.2004 - 7702/04

  SALKIC and OTHERS v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 50068/08

  In any event, the fact that the applicant's circumstances in either of those two places would be less favourable than those he enjoys in Sweden cannot be regarded as decisive from the point of view of Article 3 (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 38, ECHR 2001-I; and Salkic and others v. Sweden (dec.), no. 7702/04, 29 June 2004).

• EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 10611/09

  HUSSEINI v. SWEDEN

  In any event, the fact that the applicant's circumstances would be less favourable than those he enjoys in Sweden cannot be regarded as decisive from the point of view of Article 3 (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 38, ECHR 2001-I; Salkic and others v. Sweden (dec.), no. 7702/04, 29 June 2004; and Al-Zawatia v. Sweden (dec.) no. 50068/08, 22 June 2010).
• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 16567/10

  NACIC AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN

  The fact that the applicants" circumstances would be less favourable than those they enjoy in Sweden cannot be regarded as decisive from the point of view of Article 3 (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 38, ECHR 2001-I; Salkic and others v. Sweden (dec.), no. 7702/04, 29 June 2004; and Al-Zawatia v. Sweden (dec.) no. 50068/08, 22 June 2010).
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 34474/20

  J.N. v. SWEDEN

  As to the alleged risks faced during the journey to the Philippines, the medical certificates submitted do not address any risks related to travelling and do not indicate that the applicant's transfer, in itself, would give rise to a real risk of his being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3. Furthermore, the enforcement procedure in Sweden allows the implementation of a deportation order only if the authority responsible for the deportation considers that the individual's medical condition so permits and that authority is required to ensure that appropriate measures are taken with regard to the individual's particular needs (see, for example, Al-Zawatia v. Sweden (dec.), no. 50068/08, § 58, 22 June 2010; Karim v. Sweden (dec.), no. 24171/05, 4 July 2006; and Imamovic v. Sweden (dec.), no. 57633/10, 13 November 2012).

 
• VG Augsburg, 26.03.2015 - Au 2 K 13.30209

  Klägers

  Nur bei Vorliegen außergewöhnlicher Umstände führt die Abschiebung zu einer Verletzung von Art. 3 EMRK (EGMR, v. 2.5.1997 -30240/96, D.A/ereinigtes Königreich;… v. 27.5.2008 - 26565/05 - N./Vereinigtes Königreich Rn. 42 ff.; v. 22.6.2010 - 50068/08, Al-Zawatia/Schweden).
• EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 55463/09

  SAMINA v. SWEDEN

  In any event, the fact that the applicant's circumstances would be less favourable than those she enjoys in Sweden cannot be regarded as decisive from the point of view of Article 3 (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 38, ECHR 2001-I; Salkic and others v. Sweden (dec.), no. 7702/04, 29 June 2004; and Al-Zawatia v. Sweden (dec.) no. 50068/08, 22 June 2010).
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 50043/09

  H.N. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN

  The fact that the applicant's circumstances would be less favourable than those she enjoys in Sweden cannot be regarded as decisive from the point of view of Article 3 (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 38, ECHR 2001-I; Salkic and others v. Sweden (dec.), no. 7702/04, 29 June 2004; and Al-Zawatia v. Sweden (dec.) no. 50068/08, 22 June 2010).