Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TEIMURAZ ANDRONIKASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95

  ATHANASSOGLOU ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 9297/08

  If this first condition has been met, the Court would then enquire into the genuineness and seriousness of the dispute, and, finally, assess the degree of causality between the outcome of the dispute and the right or interest in question (see, for example, Masson and Van Zon, cited above, § 44; Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV; Syndicat des médecins exerçant en établissement hospitalier privé d'Alsace and Others v. France (dec.), no. 44051/98, 31 August 2000).
• EGMR, 31.08.2000 - 44051/98

  SYNDICAT DES MEDECINS EXERCANT EN ETABLISSEMENT HOSPITALIER PRIVE D'ALSACE et …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 9297/08

  If this first condition has been met, the Court would then enquire into the genuineness and seriousness of the dispute, and, finally, assess the degree of causality between the outcome of the dispute and the right or interest in question (see, for example, Masson and Van Zon, cited above, § 44; Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV; Syndicat des médecins exerçant en établissement hospitalier privé d'Alsace and Others v. France (dec.), no. 44051/98, 31 August 2000).
• EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 37341/04

  KIKOLASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 9297/08

  It is to be recalled that the Court may not, by its own interpretation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, create a right that has no basis in the domestic legal system (see, Masson and Van Zon, cited above, § 52; Kikolashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 37341/04, 3 February 2009; Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 27, ECHR 2000-X; Salerno v. Italy, 12 October 1992, § 14, Series A no. 245-D; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 87, ECHR 2001-V).

 
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 33804/96

  MENNITTO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 9297/08

  It is to be recalled that the Court may not, by its own interpretation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, create a right that has no basis in the domestic legal system (see, Masson and Van Zon, cited above, § 52; Kikolashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 37341/04, 3 February 2009; Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 27, ECHR 2000-X; Salerno v. Italy, 12 October 1992, § 14, Series A no. 245-D; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 87, ECHR 2001-V).
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

  Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 9297/08

  It is to be recalled that the Court may not, by its own interpretation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, create a right that has no basis in the domestic legal system (see, Masson and Van Zon, cited above, § 52; Kikolashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 37341/04, 3 February 2009; Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 27, ECHR 2000-X; Salerno v. Italy, 12 October 1992, § 14, Series A no. 245-D; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 87, ECHR 2001-V).
• EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89

  MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 9297/08

  The Government argued that, in the above-mentioned exceptional cases, the domestic courts were rather guided by the general principles of law, such as equity, and that, consequently, their rulings were a mere exercise of their discretionary power, which could not be translated into the existence of an actual right in law (Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, § 51, Series A no. 327-A).