Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ADZHIGITOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Struck out of the list (Article 37-1-a - Absence of intention to pursue application);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 2 - Right to ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 69480/01

  LOULOUÏEV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07

  Where the news of a missing person's death has been preceded by a sufficiently long period during which he or she has been deemed to have disappeared, there exists a distinct period during which the applicants have suffered the uncertainty, anguish and distress characteristic of the specific phenomenon of disappearances (see Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, § 115, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07

  For a summary of the relevant general principles see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria ([GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 145-47, ECHR 2005-VII); Biao v. Denmark ([GC], no. 38590/10, §§ 88-94, 24 May 2016); and Timishev v. Russia (nos. 55762/00 and 55974/00, §§ 53-57, ECHR 2005).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07

  The Court reiterates that an "effective investigation", as required by Article 3 of the Convention, should be "capable of leading to" the identification and - if appropriate - punishment of those responsible (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV, and Jeronovics v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898/10, § 105, 5 July 2016).

 
• EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

  ORHAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07

  The essence of such a violation does not lie mainly in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member, but rather concerns the authorities" reactions and attitudes to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva, cited above, § 164).
• EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

  ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07

  Where there has been a use of force by State agents, any deficiency in an investigation that undermines its ability to establish the circumstances of the case in question or the person responsible will risk falling foul of the required standard of effectiveness (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 233, 30 March 2016).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07

  The investigators did not identify the military personnel who had beaten the applicants, and they did not assess the individual circumstances of each of the incidents or the gravity of the injuries inflicted on the victims (compare McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 133-37, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09

  LYAPIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07

  For a summary of relevant general principles, see Gäfgen v. Germany ([GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 115-19, ECHR 2010), Bouyid (cited above, §§ 81-90, and Lyapin v. Russia, (no. 46956/09, §§ 125-27, 24 July 2014).

• EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 21882/09

  ISRAILOV v. RUSSIA

  Finally, the Court's case-law concerning similar allegations of unacknowledged detention and ill-treatment in Chechnya at around the same time as the events at issue in the present case contained descriptions analogous to those produced by the applicant, lending further credibility to his statements and calling for particular scrutiny to the explanations provided by the Government (see, among others, Abdulkadyrov and Dakhtayev v. Russia, no. 35061/04, § 61, 10 July 2018; Mukayev v. Russia, no. 22495/08, § 69, 14 March 2017; Gisayev v. Russia, no. 14811/04, § 137, 20 January 2011; and, mutatis mutandis, Adzhigitova and Others v. Russia, nos. 40165/07 and 2593/08, § 166, 22 June 2021).
• EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 33470/18

  KREYNDLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  It reiterates that the Government are obliged, as a party to the proceedings, to comply with the Court's requests to produce evidence (see Adzhigitova and Others v. Russia, nos. 40165/07 and 2593/08, § 157, 22 June 2021).
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 21648/11

  TRASKUNOVA v. RUSSIA

  The Court normally permits the next of kin to pursue an application, provided that they have a legitimate interest, where the original applicant died after lodging the application with the Court (see Adzhigitova and Others v. Russia, nos. 40165/07 and 2593/08, § 149, 22 June 2021, with further references).