Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHYB v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 20838/02

  That rule is based on the assumption, reflected in Article 13 of the Convention - with which it has close affinity - that there is an effective remedy available in respect of the alleged breach in the domestic system (see, for example, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).

• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 20838/02

  The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, among many authorities, Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII).

  It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).

• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 20838/02

  It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).

 
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 20838/02

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, § 60, 15 October 1999).
• EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 57115/00

  BOUILLY c. FRANCE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 20838/02

  It notes that the objections and arguments put forward by the Government have been rejected in earlier cases (see, among many other authorities, the Kudla judgment cited above § 160, Bouilly v. France (no. 2), no. 57115/00, § 22, 24 June 2003, D.M. v. Poland, no. 13557/02, § 47, 14 October 2003) and sees no reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case.
• EGMR, 14.10.2003 - 13557/02

  D.M. v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 20838/02

  It notes that the objections and arguments put forward by the Government have been rejected in earlier cases (see, among many other authorities, the Kudla judgment cited above § 160, Bouilly v. France (no. 2), no. 57115/00, § 22, 24 June 2003, D.M. v. Poland, no. 13557/02, § 47, 14 October 2003) and sees no reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case.
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 47627/99

  BADOWSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 20838/02

  The Polish Government have so far unsuccessfully been pleading that the civil action should be considered as an effective remedy even after the expiry of the limitation period (see, Badowski v. Poland, no. 47627/99, § 30, 8 November 2005, Barszcz v. Poland, no 71152/01, § 45, 30 May 2006).
• EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 71152/01

  BARSZCZ v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 20838/02

  The Polish Government have so far unsuccessfully been pleading that the civil action should be considered as an effective remedy even after the expiry of the limitation period (see, Badowski v. Poland, no. 47627/99, § 30, 8 November 2005, Barszcz v. Poland, no 71152/01, § 45, 30 May 2006).