Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,69249
EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90 (https://dejure.org/2009,69249)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22.09.2009 - 16094/90 (https://dejure.org/2009,69249)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22. September 2009 - 16094/90 (https://dejure.org/2009,69249)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,69249) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

  • EGMR, 11.06.2002 - 36042/97

    WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    The Court's case-law establishes that discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in relevantly similar situations (see Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV).
  • EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 29865/96

    Diskriminierung türkischer Ehefrauen durch Verpflichtung zur Tragung des Namens

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    However, not every difference in treatment will amount to a violation of Article 14. It must be established that other persons in an analogous or relevantly similar situation enjoy preferential treatment and that this distinction is discriminatory (see Unal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865/96, § 49, 16 November 2004).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    The effect of Article 13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

    DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    The Court refers, firstly, to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III; Piermont v. France, 27 April 1995, §§ 76-77, Series A no. 314; and Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 32, Series A no. 139).
  • EGMR, 27.03.2003 - 58698/00

    PAULINO TOMAS contre le PORTUGAL

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    The term "effective" is also considered to mean that the remedy must be adequate and accessible (see Vidas v. Croatia, no. 40383/04, § 34, 3 July 2008, and Paulino Tomás v. Portugal (dec.), no. 58698/00, ECHR 2003-VIII).
  • EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01

    OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    It is clear from this case-law that the authorities have a duty to take appropriate measures with regard to demonstrations in order to ensure their peaceful conduct and the safety of all citizens (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 35, 5 December 2006).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04

    BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    While an unlawful situation does not, in itself, justify an infringement of freedom of assembly (see Cisse v. France, no. 51346/99, § 50, ECHR 2002-III (extracts)), interferences with the right guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention are in principle justified for the prevention of disorder or crime and for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others where, as in the instant case, demonstrators engage in acts of violence (see, a contrario, Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 37, 17 July 2007, and Oya Ataman, cited above, §§ 41-42).
  • EGMR, 03.07.2008 - 40383/04

    VIDAS v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    The term "effective" is also considered to mean that the remedy must be adequate and accessible (see Vidas v. Croatia, no. 40383/04, § 34, 3 July 2008, and Paulino Tomás v. Portugal (dec.), no. 58698/00, ECHR 2003-VIII).
  • EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91

    PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    According to the Government of Cyprus, purchase of property was sufficient to give rise to a "claim" that would constitute a "possession" under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, §§ 31-32, Series A no. 332).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1995 - 15773/89

    PIERMONT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16094/90
    The Court refers, firstly, to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III; Piermont v. France, 27 April 1995, §§ 76-77, Series A no. 314; and Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 32, Series A no. 139).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 15312/89

    G. c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

    Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht