Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 74002/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,38351) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LIBICKI v. POLAND
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
LIBICKI v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 48176/99
TURHAN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 74002/13
In that connection, the Court reiterates that even though the truth of a value judgment is not susceptible of proof, a value judgment may be considered excessive where there is no factual basis to support it (see Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II, and Turhan v. Turkey, no. 48176/99, § 24, 19 May 2005). - EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95
FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 74002/13
The Court furthermore appreciates that the reasons put forward by that court in support of its conclusions were in keeping with the principles set forth in the Court's case-law (see, for a summary of the relevant case-law, Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, §§ 72-74, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Scharsach and News Verlagsgesellschaft v. Austria, no. 39394/98, § 30, ECHR 2003-XI). - EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 39394/98
SCHARSACH ET NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 74002/13
The Court furthermore appreciates that the reasons put forward by that court in support of its conclusions were in keeping with the principles set forth in the Court's case-law (see, for a summary of the relevant case-law, Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, §§ 72-74, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Scharsach and News Verlagsgesellschaft v. Austria, no. 39394/98, § 30, ECHR 2003-XI). - EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 26958/95
JERUSALEM c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 74002/13
In that connection, the Court reiterates that even though the truth of a value judgment is not susceptible of proof, a value judgment may be considered excessive where there is no factual basis to support it (see Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II, and Turhan v. Turkey, no. 48176/99, § 24, 19 May 2005). - EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 74002/13
40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 98 and 99, ECHR 2012, with further references).