Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 45330/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,32498) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
S.L. v. AUSTRIA
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 34 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 45330/99
- EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 45330/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83
NORRIS c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 45330/99
Nevertheless, the Court has held that Article 34 entitles individuals to contend that a law in itself violates their rights, without any individual measure of implementation, if they are directly affected by it or run a risk of being directly affected by it (see for instance the Klass and Others v. Germany judgment of 6 September 1976, Series A no. 28, p. 18, § 33 and the Norris v. Ireland judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, p. 16, § 31). - EGMR, 22.04.1993 - 15070/89
MODINOS c. CHYPRE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 45330/99
It is true that in a number of comparable cases concerning the prohibition by criminal law of homosexual activities between consenting adults, the Court has held that the very existence of legislation directly affected the respective applicants" private life on the ground that they had no other choice than either to respect the law and to refrain from engaging in prohibited sexual acts to which they were disposed by reason of their sexual orientation, or to commit such acts and thereby become liable to prosecution (see the Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 18, § 41, the Norris v. Ireland case, cited above, p. 16, § 32, and the Modinos v. Cyprus judgment of 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259, p. 11, § 24). - EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 45330/99
It is true that in a number of comparable cases concerning the prohibition by criminal law of homosexual activities between consenting adults, the Court has held that the very existence of legislation directly affected the respective applicants" private life on the ground that they had no other choice than either to respect the law and to refrain from engaging in prohibited sexual acts to which they were disposed by reason of their sexual orientation, or to commit such acts and thereby become liable to prosecution (see the Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 18, § 41, the Norris v. Ireland case, cited above, p. 16, § 32, and the Modinos v. Cyprus judgment of 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259, p. 11, § 24). - EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 45330/99
Nevertheless, the Court has held that Article 34 entitles individuals to contend that a law in itself violates their rights, without any individual measure of implementation, if they are directly affected by it or run a risk of being directly affected by it (see for instance the Klass and Others v. Germany judgment of 6 September 1976, Series A no. 28, p. 18, § 33 and the Norris v. Ireland judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, p. 16, § 31).