Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STANCIULESCU v. ROMANIA (N° 2)

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 13 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 28.08.1992 - 13704/88

  SCHWABE v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 14621/06

  The Court further notes that at the time of the events M.N. was not a public figure or a politician but an ordinary person who had been the subject of criminal proceedings in 1996 (see Schwabe v. Austria, 28 August 1992, § 32, Series A no. 242).
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

  TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 14621/06

  It reiterates that under the Convention a criminal conviction or an award of damages for defamation must bear a reasonable relationship of proportionality to the injury to reputation suffered (see, inter alia, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, § 49, Series A no. 316-B).
• EGMR, 08.09.2005 - 18624/03

  IVANCIUC c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 14621/06

  Further examination of the Article was therefore unlikely to achieve anything (mutatis mutandis, Ivanciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 18624/03, ECHR 2005-XI).

 
• EGMR, 04.06.2009 - 21277/05

  STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. AUSTRIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 14621/06

  In cases in which the Court has had to balance the protection of private life against freedom of expression, it has stressed the contribution made by the impugned forms of expression to a debate of general interest (for instance, Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, §§ 66 and 68, ECHR 2001-I; Von Hannover, cited above, § 60; and Standard Verlags GmbH v. Austria (no. 2), no. 21277/05 § 46, 4 June 2009).
• EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 42049/98

  ZWIAZEK NAUCZYCIELSTWA POLSKIEGO v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 14621/06

  The Court finds that the above complaints fall to be examined primarily under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, since the requirements of Article 13 are less strict than, and are absorbed by, those of Article 6 (see, for example, Zwiazek Nauczycielstwa Polskiego v. Poland, no. 42049/98, § 43, ECHR 2004-IX).
• EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96

  CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 14621/06

  It remains to be determined whether in the circumstances of the present case, a fair balance was struck between the protection of the applicant's freedom of expression and Ms M.N."s reputation, a right which, as an aspect of private life, is protected by Article 8 of the Convention, (see CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2004-XI, and Marchenko v. Ukraine, no. 4063/04, § 44, 19 February 2009).
• EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 41205/98

  TAMMER v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 14621/06

  In cases in which the Court has had to balance the protection of private life against freedom of expression, it has stressed the contribution made by the impugned forms of expression to a debate of general interest (for instance, Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, §§ 66 and 68, ECHR 2001-I; Von Hannover, cited above, § 60; and Standard Verlags GmbH v. Austria (no. 2), no. 21277/05 § 46, 4 June 2009).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 25716/94

  JANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 14621/06

  The Court is satisfied that the applicant's remarks did not therefore form part of an open discussion of a matter of public concern and that they did not involve the issue of freedom of the press, since the applicant was acting as a private individual (see, mutatis mutandis, Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, § 32, ECHR 1999-I).

• EGMR, 14.02.2023 - 21884/18

  "Lux-Leaks": Informant Halet zu Unrecht bestraft

  C'est ainsi que la Cour n'a pas considéré qu'était en cause une situation de lancement d'alerte lorsque le requérant n'avait pas saisi sa hiérarchie alors qu'il connaissait l'existence de voies internes de divulgation ni fourni d'explications convaincantes sur ce point (voir Bathellier c. France (déc.), no 49001/07, 12 octobre 2010, et Stanciulescu c. Roumanie (no 2) (déc.), no 14621/06, 22 novembre 2011).