Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALDER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Struck out of the list (solution of the matter) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Alder v. the United Kingdom

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 42078/02
• EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 42078/02

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 27229/95

  KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 42078/02

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including in cases against the United Kingdom, its practice as regards complaints about matters similar to those about which the present applicant complains (including Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001 III; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III; Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, ECHR 2002 II; Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00, ECHR 2003-I; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Bailey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39953/07, 19 January 2010).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 42078/02

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including in cases against the United Kingdom, its practice as regards complaints about matters similar to those about which the present applicant complains (including Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001 III; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III; Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, ECHR 2002 II; Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00, ECHR 2003-I; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Bailey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39953/07, 19 January 2010).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 42078/02

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including in cases against the United Kingdom, its practice as regards complaints about matters similar to those about which the present applicant complains (including Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001 III; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III; Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, ECHR 2002 II; Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00, ECHR 2003-I; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Bailey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39953/07, 19 January 2010).

 
• EGMR, 07.01.2003 - 57420/00

  YOUNGER contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 42078/02

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including in cases against the United Kingdom, its practice as regards complaints about matters similar to those about which the present applicant complains (including Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001 III; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III; Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, ECHR 2002 II; Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00, ECHR 2003-I; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Bailey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39953/07, 19 January 2010).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 42078/02

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including in cases against the United Kingdom, its practice as regards complaints about matters similar to those about which the present applicant complains (including Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001 III; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III; Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, ECHR 2002 II; Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00, ECHR 2003-I; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Bailey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39953/07, 19 January 2010).
• EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

  SULWINSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 42078/02

  To this end, the Court has examined carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law (in particular, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).
• EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 39953/07

  BAILEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 42078/02

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including in cases against the United Kingdom, its practice as regards complaints about matters similar to those about which the present applicant complains (including Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001 III; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III; Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, ECHR 2002 II; Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00, ECHR 2003-I; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Bailey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39953/07, 19 January 2010).

• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 26872/05

  CEKA v. ALBANIA

  It has done so, in particular, in the context of the examination of Article 2 complaints made with the Court (see, for example, Alder v. the United Kingdom (striking out), no. 42078/02, 22 November 2011; Haran v. Turkey (striking out), no. 25754/94, 26 March 2002; and, Akman v. Turkey (striking out), no. 37453/97, ECHR 2001-VI.